9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (1) TMI 1108X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arg and Mr Sharad Agarwal, Adv For the Respondent : Mr Mayank K. Nagi, Adv ORDER CM No.229/2016 in ITA 3/2016 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. CM No.228/2016 in ITA 2/2016 CM No.230/2016 in ITA 3/2016 3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay in re-filing the appeals is condoned. 4. The applications stand disposed of. ITA 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s essentially one of fact. 8. In the present case, it is not as if the relevant material was not disclosed by the Assessee in the first round of assessment. As far as AY 2005-06 is concerned, it is sought to be urged is that while framing the original assessment, the Assessing Officer (AO) had inadvertently failed to notice that accrued income of the Assessee from the disposal of stocks in the bo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sought to be made on the basis that the Assessee had claimed exemption in respect of its divided income to the extent of Rs. 4,37,82,189. According to the AO, the audit scrutiny revealed that proportionate management and administrative expenses attributable to the above income were not deducted in computing admissible exemption. After deduction of proportionate management and administrative expens ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 19.9.2006 specifically asking a query why the proportionate administrative and management expenses incurred for earning the exempted income should not be disallowed under section 14A. The assessee Corporation had replied the questionnaire vide letter dated 3.10.2006 which was taken into account and the AO had proceeded to proportionately disallowed a sum of Rs. 1,59,03,771/- under Section 14A." Fu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
