Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Shree Shyam Filaments Versus CCE-Jaipur

2016 (6) TMI 1095 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Refund claim - Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Refund was rejected on the ground that the average export clearance of final products of the appellant in the preceding quarter was less than 50% of the total clearance and did not satisfy the condition in Notification No. 5/2006 (C.E.) N.T. dated 14.3.2006. - Held that:- It is clear from the notification No. 11/2002-CE (NT) dated 11.02.2002 that the requirement of showing the value of export clearances to be more than 50% is applicable on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee. - Appeal No. E/887 & 888/2007-EX [DB] - Final Order No. 53716-53717/2015 - Dated:- 30-11-2015 - SMT. SULEKHA BEEVI C.S., MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND SHRI B. RAVICHANDRAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shri Rahul Tangri, CA for the appellants. Shri S. Nanthuk, JCDR for the respondents ORDER PER: SULEKHA BEEVI The appellants are aggrieved by rejection of their refund claim. 2. The appellants are engaged in manufacture of Poly Propylene Filament Yarn and are also availing CENVAT Credit on the duty paid on input .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns and that the authorities below failed to appreciate the condition stated in the notification in the correct perspective. The refund claim pertains to the period from July, 2005 to September, 2005. Though the authorities below have referred to Notification NO. 5/2006-CE (NT) dated 14.03.2006, the notification that would be applicable to the disputed period in the present case is the earlier one, i.e., Notification No. 11/2002-CE (NT) dated 11.02.2002. Both notifications are similar the conditi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The claims for such refund are submitted not more than once for any quarter in a calendar year. Provided that where,- (a) the average export clearances of final products or the output services in value terms is fifty per cent or more of the total clearances of final products or output services, as the case may be, in the preceding quarter; or (b) the claim is filed by Export Oriented Unit, the claim for such refund may be submitted for each calendar month. 5. It is the case of department that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version