Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT, Central Circle 3 (1) New Delhi Versus Billtech Building Elements Ltd.

Depreciation on technical know-how - Held that:- The assessee company entered into Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for transfer of business as going concern with M/s Premium Energy Transmission Ltd. (PET Ltd.). The assessee claimed to have acquired technical know-how. It was disclosed in the accounts and financial statements as an asset and depreciation was claimed on the same for the A.Y. 2005-06. The return was processed u/s 143(1). Thus the depreciation claimed on the block of assets, being .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- During this year the A.O. for the reasons given in his order, seeks to disturb the opening written down value. In our considered view this is not permitted in law. Thus the order of the First Appellate Authority, to the extent of his decision to allow depreciation on technical know-how fees is to be upheld. - Decided in favour of assessee - Rate of depreciation on computer peripherals - Held that:- The issue is covered by the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pting inclusive method. While doing so, he should have reduced the excise duty actually paid by the assessee of ₹ 1,71,31,908/- as it has been already included. In view of the above discussion we uphold the order of the First Appellate Authority in deleting the addition - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 4686/Del/2012, Cross Objection no. 422/Del/2012, ITA No. 4687/Del/2012, Cross Objection no. 423/Del/2012, ITA No. 1261/Del/2013 - Dated:- 28-6-2016 - Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Account .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Ld.CIT(A) s order is extracted for ready reference. Ground nos. 1 of A Y. 2007-08 and 3 of A.Y. 2008-09 are directed against the disallowance of ₹ 38,67,188/- and ₹ 29,00,391/- for A.Ys. 2007-08 and 2008-09 respectively on account of depreciation on technical know-how. As per the facts of the case, the appellant company is engaged in the business of manufacturing of cement bricks, blocks and slabs and other building materials The appellant company acquired the business of Auto .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

20,00,000 Building 3,80,00,000 Plant & Machinery 4,75,00,000 Intangible Assets (Technical Know How) 2,75,00,000 Net Current Assets 1,25,00,000 Gross Consideration 13,75,00,000 The appellant also obtained a valuation report dated 06.12.2004 from M/s Vastuki Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Architects and Government Approved Valuers, as per which the value of the various assets was determined as under: Particulars Amount (Rs.) Land 1,20,57,000 Building 3,89,45,713 Plant & Machinery 4,37,39,700 Intan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

allowed depreciation in respect of technical know-how on the ground that there was a difference in the cost of acquisition of the said technical know-how between the appellant's books wherein it was shown at ₹ 2,75.00,000/- and the valuation report wherein it was valued at ₹ 2,50,00,000/- The AO has also doubted the nature of the intangible asset and has mentioned that the Balance Sheet of the seller company did not show any asset in the nature of technical know-how as on 31.03.2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT(A) erred on facts and in law on allowing depreciation in respect of technical know-how amounting to ₹ 32,42,187/-. 2. The appellant craves leave for reserving the right to amend, modify, alter, add or forego any ground(s) of appeal at any time before or during the hearing of this appeal. 4.1. The Cross Objections were filed by the assessee on the following grounds for these two Assessment Years (hereinafter referred to as the A.Y.). The respondent respectfully submits as under: 1. Ld.C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on account of depreciation on technical know-how. 2. Whether the Ld.CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 1,08,565/- made on account of depreciation on computer peripherals ignoring the fact that the computer and computer software are eligible for depreciation of 60% and the same cannot be extended to computer accessories and peripherals. 3. Whether the Ld.CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of ₹ 1,71,31,908/- made on account of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

el for the assessee. 6. On a careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, perusal of material on record, orders of lower authorities, case laws cited, we hold as follows. 7. Shri KK Jaiswal, the Ld.D.R. submitted that : a. No specific agreement vis-a-vis valuation of each of the asset transferred by the seller to assessee was there which would show the value of each of the asset transferred in a specific manner. b. The MOU did not specify that any knowhow was transferred to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ginary asset and hence not entitled for depreciation. In absence of any agreement relating to transfer of a specific technology no value could be assigned to know-how. g. The mere declaration of sale of knowhow by seller in its ROI could not create an imaginary asset ( know-how). By creating asset like know-how the assessee has in fact reduced the cost of land, on which no depreciation is allowable and further the assessee has created intangible asset for claiming depreciation on the same. h. Bo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on in this year. 7.1. He relied on the order of the A.O. and submitted that the same be upheld. 7.2. The Ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that : a. There is no provision under law to disturb opening written down value. b. The impugned asset was part of the block initially for the A.Y. 2005-06 and the assessee s claim for depreciation for the A.Y. 2005-06 and 2006-07 were allowed in these years. c. The seller has offered the amount received on sale of technical know-how for taxation in its r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ith, by the Ld.CIT(A), based on the value fixed by the Valuing Officer. 8. After hearing rival submissions we hold as follows. 9. The assessee company entered into Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for transfer of business as going concern with M/s Premium Energy Transmission Ltd. (PET Ltd.). The assessee claimed to have acquired technical know-how. It was disclosed in the accounts and financial statements as an asset and depreciation was claimed on the same for the A.Y. 2005-06. The return was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eon. The assessment order was passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) of the Act and the claim of depreciation on technical know-how fees was not disturbed. 9.1. During this year the A.O. for the reasons given in his order, seeks to disturb the opening written down value. In our considered view this is not permitted in law. 9.2. The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT in the case of HSBC Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd Vs DDIT in ITA No 2028/Mum/2009, wherein the Hon ble Bench after considering the provisions of s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

3) for A.Y 2003-04 continues to exist and has not been disturbed by any proceedings under the Act. We are therefore, of the view that it was not possible for the AO in the present assessment year to take a stand different from the one taken in the earlier assessment year. Having allowed the depreciation in the immediately preceding year it is not open to the AO to take different stand for the year under consideration. On this short ground, we direct that the depreciation claimed by the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

low depreciation on technical know-how fees is to be upheld. 9.4. Even otherwise, on merits, we find that the First Appellate Authority has rightly come to a conclusion that the assessee has purchased technical know-how. The seller company had also offered this amount to tax. Under these circumstances the conclusions of the A.O. have rightly been vacated by the First Appellate Authority. In the result the appeals of the Revenue for the A.Y. 2007-08 and 2008-09 have to be dismissed. 10. Coming to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cal know-how. In the result the Cross Objections are allowed. 11. We now take up the appeal of the Revenue for the A.Y. 2009-10 in ITA 1261/Del/2013. 12. Ground no.1 of the Revenue is on the issue of allowability of depreciation on technical know-how. 12.1. Consistent with the view taken for the A.Y. 2007-08 and 2008-09 we dismiss this ground of the Revenue. 13. Ground no.2 is on the issue of rate of depreciation on computer peripherals. The issue is covered by the decision of Hon ble Delhi High .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bmission made by the Ld AR and have gone through the assessment order. From the memorandum trading account u/s 145A prepared on inclusive method as appearing on page no 4 of the assessment order, it is seen that the assessing officer has included the amount of excise duty in opening stock of goods, sales, purchases and closing stock of goods. The assessing officer has increased the amount of sales ₹ 41.75 crores by the amount of excise duty ₹ 2.76 crores (as appearing in the profit a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Manpower Service provider

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version