Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Jaypee Sidhi Cement Plant Versus C.C.E & S.T., Jabalpur

2016 (7) TMI 348 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Cenvat Credit - input services of manpower supply services for the benefit of employees - The Revenue is of the view that manpower that has been supplied by the service provider, consists of Nurses and Doctors and hence it falls under Exclusion Clause category of the definition of Rule 2(l)(C) of the Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004. - Held that:- It is can be seen from the above reproduced clause both the authorities are relying Exclusion clause which provides for excluding cenvat credit in respect of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

3562 of 2015-EX(SM) - Final Order No. 52165/2016 - Dated:- 22-6-2016 - Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Judicial Member Present Shri Bipul Agarwal, Advoate for the appellant Present Shri M.R. Sharma, A.R for the Respondent/Revenue ORDER This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. BHO-Excus-002-APP-142-15-16 dated 28.7.2015. 2. The issue involved in this case is regarding eligibility to avail cenvat credit of the service tax paid on Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency service during the period .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uthority and penalty has been imposed. 3. Ld. Counsel for the appellant draws my attention to the fact that posting of the medical profession in the factory is mandatory as per the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 and Mines Act, 1952. It is his submission that in order to follow the mandated provisions they had sought services of manpower recruitment and supply agency provide the persons to provide Doctors and Nurses, their service liability was paid. These persons were working in the facto .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the period involved in this case is covered by the Exclusion Clause under Rule 2(l)(C) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. He would submit that this issue has been decided by this Tribunal in AET Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Hyderabad -I - 2015 - TIOL -2828 - CESTAT - BANG. It is his submission that exclusion clause is for health services and is not for personal consumption of the employees. He would submit that these Doctors and Nurses a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cenvat credit of service tax paid on the services received in respect of manpower recruitment and supply agency services. It is undisputed fact that the appellant had hired service provider for supply of manpower services which has recruited posting of Doctors and Nursing staff in the appellant s factory. 6. The entire issue revolves on the Exclusion Claus as per term of Rule 2(l)(C) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 which are reproduced: (C) such as those provided in relation to outdoor catering, b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ices; in the entire provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, there is no definition of health services. At the same time, it is also being undisputed that the posting of Doctors and Nursing staff is at the behest of the appellant in order to comply with statutory obligation under the Factories Act, 1948 and Mines Act 1952, the same cannot be considered as the procurement from personal consumption of the workers. This is the tenor of the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of AET Laboratories Pvt. L .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ption of any employee. This means that when the cost is borne by the company and the company is under a legal obligation to provide outdoor catering service to its employees or to provide insurance service to its employees , the said exclusion clause would not apply. However on being questioned as to what would be the interpretation of the expression used primarily for personal use or consumption of any employee , learned Advocate failed to give any such circumstances in which case the outdoor c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version