Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Asst. CIT (OSD) , Ciurcle-9, Ahmedabad Versus Shri Sunil Dhirubhai Patel

Deduction u/s.80IB(10) - denial of the claim of deduction u/s.80IB(10) by the AO mainly for the reason that the assessee was not the owner of the land and the permission for the construction was not obtained by the assessee and the risk and reward of the project was not of the assessee - Held that:- We find that the ld.CIT(A) after considering the submissions of the assessee and after perusing the Development Agreement has given a finding that the assessee has practically purchased the land and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nor could controvert the findings of the ld.CIT(A). In view of the aforesaid facts, we find no reason to interfere with the order of the ld.CIT(A). Thus, this ground of Revenue is dismissed. - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 279/Ahd/2010 & CO No.66/Ahd/2010 - Dated:- 3-6-2016 - SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER And SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Revenue : Smt. Smiti Samant, Sr. DR. For The Assessee : Shri Parin Shah, AR ORDER PER SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

u/s.80IB of the Act. Thereafter, assessee filed revised return of income on 02/01/2007 declaring total income of ₹ 50,86,470/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and thereafter assessment was framed u/s.143(3) of the I.T.Act, 1961 vide order dated 29/12/2008 and the total income was determined at ₹ 1,48,25,286/- by disallowing the claim of deduction u/s.80IB(10) of the Act. Aggrieved by the order of Assessing Officer (AO), assessee carried the matter before the ld.CIT(A), who vide .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

owing ground:- 1. The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -XV, Ahmedabad after going through the details and submissions of the respondent found that the Respondent has fulfilled the conditions laid down for claiming deduction u/s.80IB(1) and has invested in cost of land and acquired dominant control over the land for the development of the project. The facts of Respondent s case is fully covered by the decision of Hon ble ITAT Ahmedabad, Bench A delivered in the case of M/s.Shakti Corp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and on which construction activities was carried out was not owned by the assessee and the necessary permission from the appropriate authorities was also not obtained by the assessee but the approval of the local authorities was granted to S/Shri Ambalal T.Patel and Gordhanbhai Nathabhai Patel, land owners. AO was therefore of the view that the assessee was not a Developer but was a mere Contractor and therefore was not eligible for deduction u/s.80IB(10) of the Act. He accordingly, denied the c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r 1.10.1998 and completes the project before 31.3.2008 if it has been approved by the local authority before 1.4.2004. In the case of appellant Development Permissions were given by Auda dated 24.102003 & 21.11.2003 to the attorney holder of the land owners who sold the land to the NTC (Karnavati Ghodasar Owners Association) vide conveyance deed dated 8.7.2004. It was explained that in this line of business negotiations for land start much earlier than registration of the conveyance deeds an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of 1 acre: AO has not doubted this condition and this one sands fulfilled as total area of the land is about 17223.97 sq.mtr. which is above one acre. c) The residential unit has a maximum built up area of 1500 square feet. This condition is not under dispute. d) The built up area of the shops and other commercial establishments included in the housing project does not exceed 5% of the aggregate built up area or 2000 sq.ft. whichever is less: Thus the conditions specified in section 80IB(10) me .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reproduced below: The facts involved in the case of the assessee are similar to the facts in the case of Radhe Developers (supra) and accordingly we are of the view that the assessee has acquired the dominant control over the land and has developed the housing project by incurring all the expenses and taking all the risks involved therein. We may mention here that, in our opinion, the decision in the case of Radhe Developers (supra)will not apply in a case where the assessee has entered into the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has not dealt with such situation. The proposition of law laid down in the case of Radhe Developers cannot be applied universally without looking into the development agreement entered into by the Developer along with the land owner. In the case of Shakti Corporation since the assessee has filed copy of the development agreement and crux of the agreement is that the assessee has purchased the land and has developed the housing project at its own, therefore, we are of the view that the assessee w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er of the CIT(A) ad restore all other appeals to the file of the AO with the direction that the AO shall look into the agreement entered into by each of the assessees with the land owner and decide whether the assessee has in fact purchased the land for a fixed consideration from the land owner and has developed the housing project at its own cost and risks involved in the project. In case the AO finds that practically the land has been brought by the Developer and Developer has all dominant con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ellant should have acquired dominant control over the project and should have developed the housing project at its own cost and risks. To ascertain which Hon ble ITAT directed the Development Agreement to be looked into. In this case the appellant practically purchased the land and bore the entire cost and risk of developing the project. This is proved by going through the Development Agreement specially following clauses: 2.2. (to develop the housing project Narnarayan tenements) 5.3. (entire d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7.1. (the Developer shall arrange the entire finance for the project in addition to the amounts that may be received from the prospective members) 9.1 (which says that the profit or loss that may arise out of the project will belong to the Developer). 10.3. (all residential units till they are disposed of shall remain under the possession of the Developer) As the appellant fulfills the conditions laid down for claiming deduction u/s.80IB(10) and has invested in cost of land and acquired dominan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d of the project should be of the assessee, which in the present case is not of the assessee. She therefore submitted that in such a situation, AO was fully justified in denying the claim of deduction u/s.80IB(10) of the Act. Ld.AR, on the other hand, reiterated the submissions made before the AO and ld.CIT(A) and further submitted that the ld.CIT(A) after considering the decision in the case of M/s.Shakti Corporation, Baroda in ITA No.1503/Ahd/2008 in AY 2005-06 had decided the issue in favour .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version