Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Income-tax Officer, Wd-1 (1) , Surat Versus M/s Ekta Prints Pvt. Ltd.

Reopening of assessment - Undisclosed investment made in purchase of colour and chemical - Held that:- The information has been gathered from the record held with the department which were submitted by assessee only during regular course of assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Act and they were very much available before the ld. Assessing Officer who has thereafter framed the assessment order. Certainly there was no failure on the part of the assessee company to disclose fully an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

decided certain additions against the assessee and assessee did not file appeal against confirmation of those additions, meaning thereby that those issues have become final. They cannot be deleted by quashing the assessment order on the ground of reopening. In other words revenue cannot be put in more disadvantageous situation except dismissal of its appeal. In the appeal of revenue, respondent assessee can not get positive relief. He can only get the appeal dismissed on the ground that CIT(A) h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t maintained by assessee and there is no other evidence brought on record by the ld. Assessing Officer to prove that there was any unaccounted purchases. - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 2260/Ahd/2011 - Dated:- 1-6-2016 - Shri Rajpal Yadav, JM And Shri Manish Borad, AM For the Appellant : Shri James Kurien, Sr. DR For the Respondent : Shri Hardik Vora, AR ORDER Per Manish Borad, Accountant Member This appeal of Revenue is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)-1, Surat, dated 30.6.201 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome of ₹ 1,83,40,090/-. The matter travelled upto the Tribunal wherein vide its order in ITA Nos.2696 to 2698, 1999 to 2702/Ahd/2007 dated 15th January, 2010, total income was determined at ₹ 14,00,230/- after giving effect to the order of the Tribunal. Thereafter on the basis of office records, gathered during the course of assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s.153A of the Act, ld. Assessing Officer observed that month-wise details of purchases of colour chemicals were furnished b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

otice u/s 142(1) of the Act on 9.4.2010. During the course of assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, ld. AR submitted that there was no unaccounted purchases but the difference of ₹ 47,59,796/- was only due to the adjustment of cenvat credit , discount, octroi and average of purchases which have all been accounted for in the regular books of account and furnished the following reconciliation statement to substantiate its contention :- Particulars Amount (Rs.) Total amount .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ving effect to the Tribunal s order dated 15.1.2010) and also allowed deduction of ₹ 8,27,127/- on account of loss due to fire which was wrongly denied during assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Act. Income of the assessee was assessed at ₹ 53,32,896/-. 3. Aggrieved, assessee went in appeal before ld. CIT(A) on two grounds -firstly against issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act and challenging the validity of re-assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ccounted purchases made by the assessee. However, ld. CIT(A) dismissed the ground of assessee relating to reopening of assessment proceedings u/s 147 by issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act and held that issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act and reopening of assessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act are valid in law. 5. Now aggrieved, Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal raising following grounds of appeal :- [1] On the facts and circumstance of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)-I, Surat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed to the above extent. 6. Ld. DR submitted as follows :- 1. The Ld. CIT(A) did not appreciate the fact that during the course of assessment proceedings the assessee could not satisfactorily explain the issue of unaccounted purchase of colour chemicals. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) did not appreciate the fact that no satisfactory explanation has been furnished in as such as the evidence in respect of CENVAT availed for purchase but only produced a reconciliation between the purchase figures and the amount .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er up the mistake made during the course of earlier assessment and the purchase of colour chemicals to the extent of 47,59,796/- should be treated as unaccounted investment in the hands of the assessee. 7. On the other hand, ld. AR raised an alternate plea and challenged the order of ld. CIT(A) observing that the reopening of assessment proceedings are valid in law. The ld. AR submitted that, this alternate plea can be raised under Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules, 1963 even without filing Cross Object .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

09 i.e. after the expiry of period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year which expired on 31.3.2009 and thus the same was time barred. As the same could have been issued if the assessee had failed fully and truly to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment, which is not the fact in the present case, since the reopening has been done on the basis of erroneous understanding of the data submitted during the course of original assessment proceedings and there was no new .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e other hand, on behalf of the respondent, ld. AR relying on Rule 27 of ITAT Rules, 1963 has challenged the order of ld. CIT(A) justifying the reopening of assessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act. 9. We find that as per rule 27 of ITAT Rules, the respondent even without filing an appeal or a Cross Objection can support the order of CIT(A) on any of the grounds which have been decided against the respondent under this scope of raising a plea of maintainability of the appeal without filing an ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re, going through the rule 27 of the ITAT Rules, we are of the view that the alternate plea of the respondent i.e. assessee can be adjudicated with regard to the validity of reassessment proceedings. 10. We observe that following notice was issued vide Annexure-A attached to the notice u/s 148 of the Act to the assessee on 28.8.2009 showing the reason for reopening of assessment proceedings:- ANNEXURE-A A search u/s. 132 of the Act was carried out in. the case of the assessee on 30.08.04. AS suc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the business of dyeing and printing of fabrics on job work basis. It is seen from the office records that during the course of assessment proceedings, .the Assessing Officer had called for details in respect of month wise purchase" of colour chemicals. The same is seen to have been furnished by the assessee company vide its authorized representatives' written submission, dtd. 19.07.06. Details in this respect was furnished by the ld. Authorised Representative of the assessee company at .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

47,59,796/- is not passed through the books of accounts of the assessee company. This implies that the said purchase of ₹ 47,59,796/- is unaccounted and that the cost of the same is met out of income not disclosed by the assessee in its return of income. 4. In view of the above facts, the undersigned has a reason to belief that at least an income to the extent of ₹ 47,59,796/- has escaped, assessment in the hands of the assessee company for the year under consideration within the me .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment and which comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, or re-compute the loss or the depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the case may be, for the assessment year concerned (hereafter in this section and in sections 148 to 153 referred to as the relevant assessment year) : Provided that where an assessment under sub-section (3) of section 143 or this section has been made for the relevant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r: Provided further that the Assessing Officer may assess or reassess such income, other than the income involving matters which are the subject matters of any appeal, reference or revision, which is chargeable to tax and has escaped assessment. Explanation 1.-Production before the Assessing Officer of account books or other evidence from which material evidence could with due diligence have been discovered by the Assessing Officer will not necessarily amount to disclosure within the meaning of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nished by the assessee but no assessment has been made and it is noticed by the Assessing Officer that the assessee has understated the income or has claimed excessive loss, deduction, allowance or relief in the return ; (c) where an assessment has been made, but- (i) income chargeable to tax has been under-assessed ; or (ii) such income has been assessed at too low a rate ; or (iii) such income has been made the subject of excessive relief under this Act ; or (iv) excessive loss or depreciation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

w applying the provisions of Sec.147 of the Act to the facts of the case, we observe that notice u/s 148 of the Act can be issued after the completion of four years from the end of assessment year only when any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for such assessment year by reason of failure on the part of assessee to make a return u/s 139 of the Act or in response to a notice u/s 142(1) or 148 of the Act or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tted on 19.7.2007 showed the purchases at ₹ 3,34,33,991/- and on the basis of these details ld. Assessing Officer was of the view that the difference of purchase i.e. ₹ 47,59,796/- (Rs.3,34,33,991/- ₹ 2,86,74,195/-) is of unaccounted purchases. 13. Going through the Annexures -A annexed with the notice u/s 148 of the Act, issued by ld. Assessing Officer, we observe that the information has been gathered from the record held with the department which were submitted by assessee o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, appeal of the department can be dismissed on this ground. With the help of rule 27 of ITAT Rules, respondent can raise an argument qua an issue which has been decided against him in the impugned order. The respondent may not get further positive relief. For example the ld. CIT(A) has decided certain additions against the assessee and assessee did not file appeal against confirmation of those additions, meaning thereby that those issues have become final. They cannot be deleted by quashing the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version