Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s FUSE MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Versus DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4

Reopening of assessment - nature of expenditure - capital expenditure OR revenue expenditure - interest free loan advanced by assessee company to a sister concern - Held that:- Both the issues came up for consideration before the Assessing Officer at the time of original assessment. In the letter dated 27.7.2011, the assessee had given the breakup of the expenditure of sum of ₹ 1.74crores pointing out that the same was closing stock as on 31.3.2009. The assessee also gave breakup of such s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing Officer. He in fact, suggested that such examination was not proper and that therefore, the claims were required to be disallowed. Surely, the Assessing Officer was not acting in the capacity of a revisional authority and, therefore, had no jurisdiction to judge the consideration bestowed to these claims by the Assessing Officer. In fact, there is yet another additional ground with respect to the ground of addition recorded in the reasons. The assessee has in the objections pointed out that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

J. FOR THE PETITIONER : MR B S SOPARKAR, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT : MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The petitioner has challenged the notice for reopening dated 24.3.2014 issued by respondent Assessing Officer. The petitioner is engaged in the business of Media and Entertainment sector. For the assessment year 2009-2010, the petitioner had filed return of income on 26.9.2010, declaring total income of ₹ 6.88 crores (rounded off). Such .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an amount of ₹ 1,74,79,414/- towards 'Product Development Expenses'. Since the assessment derives enduring benefit from this type of expenditure, the expenditure is capital in nature. As per section 37 of the IT Act, 1961, capital expenditure and expenditure of a personal nature are not allowable expenditure. The misclassification of expenditure resulted in underassessment of income of ₹ 1,74,79,414/- . 2.1 The amount of ₹ 1,74,79,414/- . is wrongly claimed by the asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

3CD of the Assessee Company that they had given advance to subsidiary company M/s. Fuse Interactive Pvt. Ltd. for ₹ 376.27 lakh during the year. There was an opening balance of advance amounting to ₹ 175.97 lakh. However, no interest was charged from the subsidiary company although the assessee company ha incurred interest expenses of ₹ 77.90 lakh during the year on Bank overdraft. Since the assessee had blocked their funds in the subsidiary company and not in their own busines .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment year 2009-10 and is required to be reassessed. 4. In view of above, I have reason to believe that income to the tune of ₹ 2.19 Cr (1.74 Cr. +45.15 lakhs) has escaped assessment. 2. The petitioner raised objections to the process of reopening under communication dated 11.6.2014. Such objections were rejected on 16.9.2014. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner taking us through the material on record contended that the Assessing Officer had examined both the claims mentioned in the reas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ure of capital expenditure, but wrongly claimed as revenue expenditure. Second issue pertains to interest free loan advanced by assessee company to a sister concern. In that respect, as pointed out by the counsel for the Revenue, during the assessment proceedings, the assessee had conveyed to the Assessing Officer under a letter dated 27.7.2011 as under : 5) Inventory For the Assessment year under consideration, the company does not have any opening stock but the closing stock as at 31st March 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

all of its administrative applications. This system is called Fuse+Media Web Application (FMWA). b) ₹ 95,31,342 for the script, storyboards, writing and voice recording etc. for the animation episodes produced. The script and all the rights like copyrights, trade secret, mask work, rights, trademark, etc. thereto belong to the assessee i.e. the company. The breakup of, the above mentioned amount, as stated above, in enclosed herewith in Annexure No. 8. Please note that the stock of the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y has been utilized to advance money to FIPL and not used entirely by FMPL for its own business. In this regard, it would be pertinent to refer to the provisions of the said section which is reproduced hereunder: (iii) the amount of the interest paid in respect of capital borrowed for the purposes of the business or profession: Provided that any amount of the interest paid, in respect of capital borrowed for acquisition of an asset for extension of existing business or profession (whether capita .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rt of its larger business objective, it has incorporated FlPL to jointly carry out the activities of animation studio and to produce animation episodes. FlPL has produced 7 (seven) episodes of "Doubtsourcing series . These episodes have also won two international awards. As ultimately, FlPL has been furthering the business objective of FMPL by producing animation episodes, it was commercially expedient for FMPL to advance the said amount to FlPL to enable it to produce the said episodes. in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is made to a sister concern from the commercial expediency of the business, no disallowance be made to the total income. The relevant observation of the Hon ble Supreme Court is as under: "It is true that the amount borrowed in question was not utilized by the assessee in its own business, but had been advances as interest free loan to its sister concern. However in our opinion, the fact is not really relevant. What is relevant is whether the assessee advanced such amount to its sister conc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n of board of directors and assume the role to decide how much is reasonable expenditure having regard to the circumstances of the case. No businessman can be compelled to maximize its profits. The income tax authorities must put themselves in the shoes of the assessee and see how a prudent businessman would act. The authorities must not look at the matter from their own view point but that of a prudent businessman. As already stated above, we have to see the transfer of borrowed funds to a sist .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

also be placed on the decision of the Hon ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT vs. Sambandham Spinning Mills Limited (298 lTR 306) wherein the Hon ble High Court has held that no disallowance of interest paid on borrowed capital be made when the tax payer has granted interest free advance to its sister concern. In view of the above decisions, it is submitted that money advanced to a wholly owned subsidiary based on the commercial expediency of the business, no disallowance can be made in ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed 4.10.2011, the assessee had made a detailed submission why no addition should be made on the ground that the assessee had made interest free advances to a sister concern. 8. Any attempt on part of the Assessing Officer now to revisit such claims would be based on change of opinion. In fact, when the assessee brought this aspect to the notice of the Assessing Officer in the objections, the Assessing Officer had the following to say : 6. As a matter of fact, it appears that no such inquiries ha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thority, the Assessing Officer cannot take a view, either against or in favour of the assessee/revenue, without making proper enquiries and without proper examination of the claim made by the assessee in the light of applicable law. Reference is made to the decision of Delhi High Court in the case of GEE VEE Enterprise v. Addl. CIT (99 ITR 375) wherein after considering the decision of Supreme Court in cases of Ram Pyari Devi Saraogi v. CIT( 67 ITR 84) and Smt. Tara Devi Agarwal v CIT (88 ITR 32 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version