New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 197 - CESTAT KOLKATA

2016 (8) TMI 197 - CESTAT KOLKATA - TMI - Refund claim rejected relevant date - original refund claim filed within period of limitation defects corrected filing revised return after some time appellant claimed refund filing date to be taken when original refund claim filed respondent contended return to be complete in all respects when revised return filed and hence taken as date of return filed. - Held that: when the defect was rectified, the date when original return filed needs to be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dhury, Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant argued that refund claim of ₹ 1,46,444/- has been rejected by the first appellate authority as time barred. It is the case of the appellant that refund claim was filed in time in the month of November, 2009 within one year. That appellant did not submit a certificate from the jurisdictional Superintendent of the Customs regarding non-availment of CENVAT credit with respect to refund sought for. That after doing the needful, the refund cl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Commr. of C. Ex. Raipur-Vs.-Simplex Engg. & Foundary WorksPvt. Ltd. -2016 (333) ELT 112 (Tri.-Del) (ii) Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex., Kolkata-VI-2015 (315) ELT 100 (Tri.- Kolkata) (iii) Commr. of Cus., ICD,TKD, New Delhi Vs. Marvel Polymers Pvt. Ltd. -2013 (294) ELT 272(Tri.-Del.) (iv) Commr. of C.Ex., Madurai-Vs.-Sundaram Industries Ltd.-2011 (263) ELT 615 (Tri.-Chennai) (v) Duraline India Pvt. Ltd.-Vs.-Commr. of C. Ex., GOA 2009 (237) ELT 689 (Tri.-Mumbai) (vi) IGP Eng .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

laim again on 25/08/2010. First Appellate Authority has taken a view that relevant date of filing the refund claim should be taken as 25/8/2010 when refund claim was filed after rectification. The Ld. Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant relied upon the case law of this Bench in the case of Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex., Kolkata-VI- 2015 (315) ELT 100 (Tri.-Kolkata). After going through the provisions of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 this Bench made fol .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ordingly, the defects were removed and the refund claim was again submitted on 12-6-2003. It is the contention of the Appellant that the date of refund claim be considered as 11th December, 2002, whereas the Revenue submits that it was complete in all respects, when filed on 12th June, 2003, hence that should be taken as the filing date. In rejecting the refund claim as time-barred, both the authorities below had observed that the date on which refund claim was filed only after removal of defect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version