Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2008 (2) TMI 86

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t [Order]-1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) 13.3.2007 upholding the adjudication order of the Assistant Commissioner dated 16.10.2006. By the said order the Assistant Commissioner had directed recovery of service tax credit of Rs.17,528/- under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with rule 14(6) of the Cenvat Credit rules, 2004 and interest at the applicable rate under Section 75 of the Finance Act, and imposed penalties@ Rs,100/- per day under Section 76 of the said Act and of Rs.17,528/- under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. 2. The facts of the case briefly stated are these. The appellant is a tour operator. For the tour operator services provided by it .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n pari materia to rule 3(6) of the Service Tax Credit Rules therein. The question as to whether any output service provided from mobile phone thereafter would qualify for service tax credit, therefore, does not arise. The question is whether for the period prior to 10.9.2004 any service provided as output service from mobile phone is entitled to claim service tax credit. 5. On behalf of the Revenue my attention was drawn to para 2.8 of the Circular of the Central Board of Excise Customs (CBEC) No.59/8/03-ST dated 20.6.2003 and it may be useful to quote the same verbatim as under :- "In regard to credit of service tax on telephone connection, queries have been raised as to whether service tax credit would be admissible on telep .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not entitled to claim service tax credit, it will follow that he was liable to pay service tax, and that being the position, it cannot claim any advantage in the matter of liability to pay service tax under Section 76. 7. Counsel submitted that penalty under Section 76 may be waived as the appellant was misled into believing that it was entitled to claim the service tax credit. It was submitted that Section 80 provides for such waiver if there is a reasonable cause for failure to pay the service tax. I have considered the submission of the counsel, but having regard to the unambiguous language in the statute, I am unable to accept the same. As observed above the rule does not admit of any doubt that the service provider is entitled t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates