GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 343 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

2016 (8) TMI 343 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD - TMI - Cenvat credit - Entitlement - Steel goods - Held that:- by relying on the finding of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of India Cements Ltd. Vs. Cestat [2015 (3) TMI 661 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] and Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Mundra Port & Special Economic Zone Ltd. Vs. CCE [2015 (5) TMI 663 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT], Shape & Section, angles, M.S. Plates/rounds, beams, rails etc. and also welding electrodes used in fabrication/construction o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

kkarwar, Member (Technical) Present for the Appellant: Shri Pradeep Kumar Mittal, Advocate Present for the Respondent: Shri D.K. Deb (Assistant Commissioner) A.R. ORDER The issue in this appeal are - i) Whether the appellant, a manufacturer of Sugar, is entitled to Cenvat credit on Steels goods such as Shape & Section, angles, M.S. Plates/rounds, beams, rails etc. falling under Chapter Heading 72, 73 & 83 of CET Act, also welding electrodes used in fabrication/construction of capital goo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dmissible Cenvat credit amounting to ₹ 1,03,34,766 on steel items like Shape & Section, Angles, M.S. Plates/rounds, Beams, Rails etc. as inputs in construction/fabrication of structural supports embedded to earth, Frame works, working platforms, etc. Such goods as per Revenue are neither inputs nor capital goods as defined in Rule 2 of CCR, 2004. Accordingly show cause notice dated 01.3.2012 was issued for recovery of Cenvat taken ₹ 1.03,34,766/-, along with interest & penalt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

& (k) of CCR, 2004. So far the contention of appellant that they have fabricated (i) Boiler accessories, (ii) Accessories of Boiling house (centrifugal machine, crystalliser, Evaporator, Juice clarifier, Juice Sulphiter, Pan Rotary Screen, Sulphur Furnace, Water Tank (iii) Mill House accessories (Cane carrier, Cane gantry Cane unloader, Fibrizer etc. (iv) Drier House accessories (Centrifugal machine, Sugar grader) (v) Accessories of Cable tray, control panel, D.G. Set, Gantry, Transformer; .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stablished that the goods in manufacture of which welding electrodes have been used are not goods, then welding electrodes cannot be considered as input eligible for credit Further the explanation -2 of Rule 2(k) of CCR, 2004 inserted wne.f. of 07.7.2009 was held to have retrospective effect following Larger bench ruling of this Tribunal in Vandana Global Ltd, Vs. CCE Raipur (Supra). On the issue of applicability of extended period of limitation, it was held that same is applicable as mere perio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mill engaged in manufacture of sugar and molasses chargeable to Central Excise duty. The dispute is in respect of Cenvat credit in respect of MS Angles, Channels, Plates etc. which according to the appellant were used for repair and maintenance of the as well as for fabrication of sugar machinery. The Cenvat credit of ₹ 71,090/- was taken in respect of welding electrodes and credit of ₹ 99,342/- was taken in respect of steel items during the period from January, 2009 to August, 2009. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

als) vide Order-in-Appeal dated 22-10-2010 except for reduction of penalty to ₹ 20,000/-. In this order, the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance are not eligible for Cenvat credit either as inputs or as capital goods and in respect of steel items, while observing that these items were used for fabrication of various mill house machinery such as Cane Carrier side plate and Leveller/Chopper Hoods, Bagasse Cilo Pipe, Bagasse Carrier, Sulphur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Raipur reported in 2010 (253) E.L.T. 440 (Tri. - LB). Against this order of the Commissioner (Appeals), this appeal has been filed. 2. Heard both the sides. 3. Shri G.K. Mahajan, Advocate, the learned Counsel for the appellant, pleaded that so far as welding electrodes are concerned, their use in repair and maintenance of the plant and machinery is not disputed at any stage, that there are judgments of three High Courts - judgment of Hon ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Hindust .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat as regards the steel items namely MS Steel, MS Plates and MS Angles, the same have either been used for fabrication of various items of sugar mill machinery or for repair and maintenance of sugar mill machinery, as has been observed by the Assistant Commissioner in his Order-in-Original as well as in the show cause notice, that Commissioner (Appeals) has in his order has wrongly mentioned that part of the steel items were used in erection of supporting structures for machinery, as there is n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hop for repair and maintenance are eligible for Cenvat credit and this civil appeal filed against this judgment of Hon ble Rajasthan High Court has been dismissed by the Apex Court vide judgment reported in 2007 (214) E.L.T. A115 (S.C.), that the steel items used for fabrication of various items of sugar mill machinery like Cane Carrier side plate and Leveller/Chopper Hoods, Bagasse Cilo Pipe, Bagasse Carrier etc. being sugar mill machinery and, hence, covered by Chapter 84, would be eligible fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reported in 2012 (278) E.L.T. 167 (A.P.), wherein it was held that welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of the plant and machinery are not eligible for Cenvat credit. 5. I have considered the submissions from both the sides and perused the records. 6. So far as eligibility for Cenvat credit of the welding electrodes used for repair and machinery of the plant and machinery is concerned, this issue stands decided by the judgment of three High Courts, as mentioned above - ju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ase of Sree Rayalaseema Hi-Strength Hypo Ltd. v. CCE, Tirupati (supra), it is the judgment of the other three High Courts which would hold the field. Moreover, repair and maintenance is an activity without which manufacturing activity would not be commercially feasible even though theoretically it may be possible to carry out manufacturing activity without repair of plant and machinery. Apex Court in the case of J.K. Cotton Spg. & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur reported .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has interpreted the expression used in the manufacture of in the above manner, the scope of the expression - used in or in relation to manufacture, whether directly or indirectly in the definition of input in Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 would be much wider. Moreover, Hon ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Singh Alloys & Steel Ltd. v. Assistant Collector of Central Excise reported in 1993 (66) E.L.T. 594 (Cal.) has held that the definition of input does not depend on what .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

turing activity may be theoretically possible, the same would not be commercially feasible. The question as to whether repair and maintenance is an activity distinct and separate from manufacture has nothing to do with the question as to whether repair and maintenance has nexus with manufacture. Looked at from criteria prescribed by the Apex court in the case of J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur (supra), the activity of repair and maintenance has to be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the show cause notice nor any finding in the Assistant Commissioner s order that the steel items were used for structural supports and hence the observation in the Commissioner (Appeals) order that part of the steel items were used for structural support is factually incorrect. Once it is accepted that steel items have been used for fabrication of various items of sugar mill machinery as mentioned in the Order-in-Original passed by the Assistant Commissioner on their repair and maintenance, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n of this Tribunal in Vandana Global Ltd, Vs, CCE Raipur reported in 2010 (253) E.L.T. 440 (Tri. LB) that the Explanation -2 in Rule 2(k) of CCR, 2004, inserted w.e.f. 07.07.2009, have only prospective effect, observing that there is nothing in the Amending Act to suggest that the amendment made was clarificatory in nature. The Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in CCE Vs Sai Samhita Storages (P) Ltd. reported in MANU/ AP/ 0510/2011 have held that the assessee engaged in business of providing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cise, Delhi - III) in Civil Appeal No, 5295 of 2003 dated 02.8.2011 by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue is concerned, we find that this Court had earlier considered the case of the assessee in two similar cases of the previous assessment years in CM.A, No. 1301 of 2005 dated 31.12.2012, where a reference was made to an order passed earlier in respect of the very same assessee. While dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue, the Division Bench of this Court held as follows .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sher, kiln, hoppers, pre-heaters, conveyor system, etc. and that without these structural, the machinery could not be erected and would not function. 9. In the decision reported in AIT-2011-358-HC (The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/s India Cements Limited), pointing out to Rule 57Q and the interpretation placed by the Apex Court in the decision in Commissioner of Central Excise Jaipur Vs, Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd.(Supra) and in particular Paragraph Nos. 12 and 13, wherei .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ati Sugar Mills Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III (Supra) is concerned, we do not think that the said decision would be of any assistance to the Revenue, considering the factual finding by the Tribunal therein in the decided case that the machineries purchased by the assessee were machineries themselves. Thus, after referring to the decision in CCE Jaipur Vs. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd.), the Apex Court held that in view of the findings rendered by the Tribunal that t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

for the revenue pointed out that the tribunal had merely passed a cryptic order by referring to the earlier decisions. We do not think that this would in any manner prejudice the case of the Revenue, given the fact that on the identical set of facts, the assessee's own case was considered by this Court and by following the decision reported in (Commissioner of Central Excise Jaipur Vs. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd), the Revenue's appeal was also rejected circumstances, this .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Commissioner of Central Excise Jaipur Vs. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd (Supra) and held that the Tribunal was justified in allowing the assessee's contention in respect of the very same assessee. 15. Accordingly, following the principles laid down in Commissioner of Central Excise Jaipur Vs. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. (Supra) and the earlier decisions of this Court in C.M.A. No. 3101 of 2005 dated 13.12.2012 and C.M.A No, 1265 of 2014 dated 10.7.2014, we ar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version