Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 926 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (8) TMI 926 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2016 (340) E.L.T. 201 (Tri. - Del.) - Imposition of penalty - Classification of imported goods - import of small quantity of housing by courier – connectors – housing made of plastics – bonafide mistake on the part of courier agency to avail exemption in small quantity of import of housing – immediate discharge of duty with interest on recognition – Held that: - ‘Housing' made of plastic is not eligible for exemption available to the 'connector's. However ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts – penalty reduced to ₹ 10,000 – decided partly in favor of appellant. - Customs Appeal No. 50/2011 - Final Order No. 52492/2016 - Dated:- 20-7-2016 - (Dr.) Satish Chandra, President and Mr. B. Ravichandran, Technical Member Present Shri Nupur Maheshwari, Advocate for the appellants Present Mrs. Suchitra Sharma, A.R. for Revenue ORDER The appeal is against the order dated 2.11.2010 of Commissioner (Appeals), IGI Airport, New Delhi. The appellants are regular importers of 'connectors& .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

which are not eligible for such concession. Proceedings were initiated against the appellant to recover differential duty and to impose penalty. The original authority confirmed the demand of ₹ 7,78,296/- along with interest and imposed penalty of ₹ 5 lakhs on the appellant under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962. On appeal, the Id. Commissioner (Appeals) vide his impugned order upheld the findings of the original authority except for reducing penalty of ₹ 5 lakhs to ₹ 1 l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

; also. She further submitted that consignment being very small in value and no individual authorization indicating claim of exemption was given to the courier. The bona fide mistake for such claim of exemption can very well be inferred from the fact that the appellant never claimed exemption whenever bulk imports through port were made and also on being pointed out of such error they have remitted duty involved for all the past imports along with applicable interest before issue of show cause n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version