Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 1123 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (8) TMI 1123 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2016 (45) S.T.R. 128 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Non fulfilling the obligation to deposit the collected tax to the Government of India - penalty imposed - Held that:- The provisions of Finance Act 1994 and the rules framed therein require deposit of tax by the 5th of the following month. There is no requirement to deposit tax on the date of collection but can be held within the business enterprise till the stipulated date. It would appear that the appellant-assessee had .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ations. There is also no doubt that there is an obligation cast upon every service provider to collect the tax due through the service recipient and deposit the amount with the exchequer. However, the law does contemplate and is not averse to use of the tax so collected within the business till the stipulated date for payment. That this period was unilaterally extended by the assessee is not in dispute. Yet, the contention of the assessee that delay is not evidence of intention to evade tax is n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on 80 to set aside the penalties imposed. - ST/341/2009 & ST/15/2010 CROSS-OBJECTION NO: ST/CO-74/2011 - A/88881-88883/16/STB - Dated:- 1-8-2016 - Shri M V Ravindran, Member (Judicial) and Shri C J Mathew, Member (Technical) Shri R. K. Das, Dy. Commissioner (AR) for Revenue Shri Kewal Shah, Chartered Accountant for the assessee. ORDER This appeal has been filed against order-in-original no: 13/STC/BR/09-10 dated 12th October 2009 of Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai, which confirmed tax demand .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

efore the original authority, M/s Shlok Media Pvt Ltd submitted that they had been regular in paying service tax on the basis of billings till March 2006 and thereafter on receipt basis. It was claimed that some of their clients had defaulted on payments leading to financial crisis which prevented them from discharging their tax obligations. It is observed that assessee had deposited an amount of ₹ 71,85,266/- towards tax and interest for the period between April 2006 and April 2007. 3. Re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

but owing to severe financial crisis. It is also their contention that the proviso to section 73(3) estopping issue of notice is applicable as the tax liability was discharged along with interest as early as December 2007. 4. Learned Chartered Accountant appearing for the appellant-assessee contends that the services provided by the appellant is that of 'sale of space for advertising' and not the service invoked in the show cause notice. It is also contended that there has been no willf .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rvice Tax [2006 (2) STR 330 (Tri.-Bang.)]. 5. On the appeal of Revenue, Learned Authorised Representative cited the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in Union of India v. Dharmendra Textile Processors [2008 (231) ELT 3 (SC) which held that mandatory penalty in tax statutes cannot be diluted for any reason whatsoever. 6. It is seen that the appellant-assessee claims that they are in the business of display of advertising and hoarding and leasing of hoardings and therefore are not liable tax p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the facts of the case that their clients were advertising agencies who had defaulted in their contractual commitments leading to a fund crisis as their own creditors had to be satisfied. It is also their contention that they had obtained a bank loan for meeting the service tax obligation. They, therefore, pleaded for invoking the provisions of section 80 of Finance Act 1994. 7. The allegation of Revenue is that the appellant-assessee had collected tax and not fulfilled its obligation to deposit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version