Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 1153 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (4) TMI 1153 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI - 2016 (338) E.L.T. 721 (Tri. - Del.) - Imposition of penalty - Section 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 CHA classification food supplements medicaments Held that: - the imported goods were declared as classifiable under heading food supplements, as informed to the CHA. Further it was CHA only who applied for first check. The issue of classification is a complex issue and it cannot be said that the CHA should .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ish (Advocate) For the Respondent : K. Poddar (Authorized Representative (DR)) ORDER Archana Wadhwa (Judicial Member) The challenge in the present appeal is to imposition of penalty of ₹ 25,000/- imposed upon the appellant, which is a CHA, in terms of the provision of Section 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 readwith Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. As per facts on record, the present CHA filed a bill of entry on behalf of one importer M/s Artlife Wellness Products Pvt. Ltd., decla .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uld act as conclusion of proceedings against all the co-noticees. For the above proposition, they relied upon the Tribunals majority decision in the case of S.K. Colombowala vs. CC (Import), Mumbai reported as 2007 (220) E.L.T. 492 (Tribunal Mumbai) as also on another decision in the case of Windoors (India) vs. CCE, Mumbai II reported in 2009 (246) E.L.T. 345 (Tri. Mumbai). The Commissioner has not followed the S.K. Colombowala vs. CC (Import), Mumbai (supra) decision, even though he agreed tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the above reasoning of the Adjudicating Authority. The Commissioner has accepted the fact that the ratio of the decisions relied upon by the assessee is fully applicable, but has refused to follow the same on the ground that one of the Member gave a dissenting judgment. It is seen that originally there was a difference of opinion between the two Members in the said case of S.K. Colombowala vs. CC (Import), Mumbai (supra), which was resolved by third Member. It is the majority decision of the Tr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version