GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (9) TMI 93 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (9) TMI 93 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2016 (341) E.L.T. 279 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Valuation - Includability - in the assessable value of the goods i.e. monoliths/signages cleared from the factory - amounts collected by the respondent as charges towards erection, installation and commissioning charges and pre-delivery inspection charges - Held that:- the issue is now squarely covered by the judgment of the apex court in the case of Thermax Ltd. vs. CCE [1998 (4) TMI 134 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] wherein .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icial) and Mr. Devender Singh, Member (Technical) Shri H.M. Dixit, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for appellant Shri R.V. Shetty, Advocate, for respondent ORDER This appeal is filed by the Revenue against order-in-appeal No. BR/18/M-IV/2005 dated 21.1.2005. 2. The relevant facts that arise for consideration are the respondent herein is a manufacturer of monoliths/signages (hereinafter referred to as the goods) of various types. It is the case of the Revenue that during April 1999 to December 2003, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ding differential duty, which was adjudicated by the authority after following due process of law and the central excise duty as well as interest thereon was confirmed and penalties were also imposed. Aggrieved such an order, an appeal was preferred before the first appellate authority who, after considering the facts of the case and various binding decisions, set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal. 3. Learned departmental representative arguing on behalf of the Revenue, draws our a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the value of the goods as post July 2000, transaction value regime came into picture, due to which any amount which is collection in relation to the same, duty liability has to be discharged. He would submit that the monoliths/signages will come into existence only when there is a permanent light source to the illuminated signboard. He would rely upon the Board s circular dated 1.7.2002 which clarified that amounts collected for erection, installation and commissioning charges are includible i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

now squared covered by the judgments of the Tribunal in the case of Madras Power Supplies vs. CCE, Chennai reported in 2002 (149) ELT 369, Apollo Tyres Ltd. vs. CCE, Cochin reported in 2003 (160) ELT 836 and the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Thermax Ltd. vs. CCE reported in 1998 (99) ELT 481 (SC). 5. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides and perusal of records, we find that the issue which falls for our consideration is whether the amounts collecte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lso on the entire value of monoliths/signages. This would indicate that what was cleared from the factory premises of the respondent was a complete monolith. The contract specifically indicates that erection and commissioning of the said monolith can be undertaken by the respondent for an additional payment. It is nowhere indicative in the contract that the respondent was obliged to do the said installation and erection and no one else was to be appointed for such work. In the absence of any res .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

atio which is in paragraphs 9 to 13. 9. The only question, therefore, with which we are left in these appeals is whether the erection and commissioning charges for which the appellants had separately charged from its customers could be legally included in the assessable value of the goods, namely, the Boiler manufactured and supplied by the appellants. Or, to put it differently, whether the installation and commissioning charges are exigible to excise duty? This controversy stands concluded by t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

v. Collector of Central Excise, Meerut, 1996 (88) E.L.T. 622 (S.C.) = (1997) 1 SCC 203, Mono Vertical Crystallisers which were used in sugar factories for exhausting molasses of sugar were assembled, erected and attached to the earth at the site of the customers sugar factory. The process involved welding and gas cutting as deep Mono Vertical Crystallisers had to be assembled, erected and attached to the earth by a foundation at the site of the sugar factory. It was held that the erection and i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version