TMI Blog2016 (9) TMI 771X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... - ignorance of subsequent payments made by the petitioner - defferal loan of ₹ 1,70,25,455/- availed - payment of ₹ 1,45,17,406/- constituting 85% of the total amount made so far - petitioner liable to pay only a sum of ₹ 25,08,049/- - demand of ₹ 59,82,269/- made from petitioner towards balance loan amount - two demand drafts brought by petitioner to show his bonafides - o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eader ORDER The 2nd respondent/Assistant Commissioner(CT), Thirumangalam Assessment Circle, Madurai District, has issued the impugned proceedings dated 27.07.2016, calling upon the petitioner to pay a sum of ₹ 59,82,269/-. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed this writ petition, on the ground that the 2nd respondent has not followed the correct calculation including s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... titioner started repayment of the loan availed and the amount yet to be paid now the balance amount is only ₹ 25,08,049/-, but without even giving any correct calculation, the respondent has wrongly quoting the said amount of ₹ 59,82,269/- has taken action under the Tamilnadu Revenue Recovery Act for attaching the landed property belonging to the petitioner company. In order to avoid t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed before this Court can be realised by the respondent department. In the meanwhile, the respondents are directed to re- consider the case of the petitioner on the basis of the representation by providing personal hearing only after considering the case of the petitioner afresh, a fresh order may be passed. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. As I mentioned above, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
