New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (9) TMI 839 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (9) TMI 839 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Captively consumed goods - Valuation - goods captively consumed for further manufacturing of excisable goods from the factory premises - period involved is February 1997 to January 2002 - Held that:- as regards the period prior to 01.07.2000 provisions of Rule 6 (b)(i) of Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 could be applicable in the case wherein the goods are captively consumed as well as sold outside. Revenue's case is that the appellant should have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat the valuation of captively consumed goods needs to be done based upon the provisions of Rule 6(b)(i) of Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 read with Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944. - As regards the liability post 01.07.2000, we find that the provisions of Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules are very clear inasmuch as the said Rules mandate from an assessee to discharge the duty liability on 110% or 115% of the cost of production of the goods. Apparently the appellant had produced a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g with interest and also imposition of penalty. - Decided against the appellant - E/69, 70/07 - A/89331-89332/16/EB - Dated:- 24-8-2016 - Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) and Mr. Devender Singh, Member (Technical) None for appellant Shri S. Hasija, Supdt. (AR) for respondent ORDER These two appeals are disposed of by a common order as they are challenging the same impugned order. 2. It is seen that personal hearing notices sent to the appellant were returned to the Tribunal undelivered. A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he appellant who declined to give his residential address to serve the notice. In view of this fact that the appellant as well as the Managing Director are uncooperative to receive the notices from the Tribunal, we take up the appeals for disposal as the appeals are of 2007. 3. Heard learned D.R. and perused the records. 4. The issue involved in this case is regarding the valuation of the goods which were captively consumed for further manufacturing of the excisable goods from the factory premis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version