Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner, Central Excise Delhi Versus M/s Sarita Handa Export Pvt. Ltd.

2016 (9) TMI 891 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Cenvat Credit - Inputs/Services used in the manufacture of exempted goods - Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - respondent is clearing one of their products i.e. 100% cotton item under 'nil' rate of duty - export of goods manufactured - Held th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

adesh High Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Drish Shoes Ltd. [2010 (5) TMI 334 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT], have been upheld granting relief to the assessee, we do not find that any substantial question of law arises in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al, J. The revenue has filed the present appeal against the order dated 30.4.2014 passed in Excise Appeal No. E/3603 of 2012, by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') raising the following substan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

100% cotton item under 'nil' rate of duty? (ii) Whether the respondent has violated the provisions of Rule 3 and Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004? (iii) Whether the Cenvat Credit wrongly availed by the respondent is liable to be disall .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the country. The adjudicating authority had accepted the claim to the assessee. The department aggrieved against the order passed by the adjudicating Authority had preferred appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, while referring to the judgments .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arp Menthol India Ltd, 2011 (270) ELT 212 dismissed the appeals filed by the Department. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly did not dispute the fact that against the judgment of Himachal Pradesh High Court in Drish Shoes Ltd's Case (supra), t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version