New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (9) TMI 1014 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (9) TMI 1014 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Rectification of mistake - seeking rectification of various errors in the final order - Held that:- it is found that the Bench has categorically recorded the findings on all the submissions made by the applicant-respondent. The Bench has also clearly indicated why it has arrived at a conclusion to hold that prior to 1.7.2000, the provisions of Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Valuation Rules, 2000 needs to be applied into, read with circular. The Bench has clearly i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that these are mistakes apparent on the face of the record. This is not in consonance with the settled law that error apparent on the face of the record should not be an alibi for rearguing the entire case. - Decided against the appellant - E/3209/04-Mum - M/89333/16/EB - Dated:- 24-8-2016 - Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) and Mr. C.J. Mathew, Member (Technical) For the Appellant : Mr. V. Sridharan, Sr. Advocate with Shri Prakash Shah, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Hitesh Shah, Commission .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the case of Cadbury India Ltd. And Raymond Ltd. and subsequent and prior orders passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal and which were cited before and referred to in the final order dated 4.8.2015. (b) That the appellant relied upon direct binding judgment of the Hon ble High Court of Madras in the case of Sterlite Industries Ltd. - 2009 (246) ELT 109 (Mad.) and it was referred to but was not followed by the Tribunal. (c) The Tribunal erred in recording a finding that the applicant/r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

30.10.1996. It is his submission that the Bench has totally overlooked and ignored the above facts on record and proceeded on the assumption that the applicant/respondent did not dispute the applicability of the circular, which is a mistake apparent on the fact of the records. (d) Another error apparent on the records according to him is that the assessee had disputed the inclusion of overheads which are not attributable to manufacture of goods under assessment and it was raised before the lower .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dice to the conditions of availment of cenvat credit and calculation sheet was also enclosed. (f) The other mistake apparent on the face of the record as per them is that the Bench has sustained the inclusion of entire overheads of the applicant-respondent as appearing in the balance sheet, which is not correct as they had disputed the inclusion of the overheads not attributable to the goods under assessment and this submission was an alternative and without prejudice to the contentions of the o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version