Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2011 (4) TMI 1423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rnment was sought by the assessee vide his application earlier on 11.01.2011 and the case was adjourned on the request of the learned counsel for 06.04.2011. Hence, the adjournment application filed on behalf of the assessee was dismissed for want of plausible reasons. We, therefore, decided to dispose of the appeal and the cross objection after hearing the learned Departmental Representative. 3. The brief facts of the issue involved in appeal of Revenue are that the Assessing Officer treated the following amounts as share trading income taxable under the head business : i) Long term capital gains on sale of shares before 01.10.2004 Rs.1,71,530/- ii) Short term capital gains on s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s dismissed. 6. As regards the cross objection filed by assessee, the first ground is supportive of the order of CIT(A) on the issue raised by revenue in its appeal. We have already dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, therefore, this ground becomes infructuous and dismissed as such. 7. Ground No. 2 relates to disallowance of ₹ 1,07,375/- u/s. 40(a)(ia). The Assessing Officer noted from the profit and loss account that the assessee has debited a sum of ₹ 1,07,375/- as interest to the creditors. Since the assessee has not deducted any tax at source, therefore, the Assessing Officer disallowed the same u/s. 40(a)(ia). When the matter went before the CIT(A), the CIT(A) confirmed the order of Assessing Officer by observing as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 07,375/- to the appellant s business income. The addition of ₹ 1,07,375/- is hereby confirmed. 8. We have heard the learned DR and have carefully considered his submissions alongwith the facts on record before the authorities below. The CIT(A) has given finding of fact that fortis securities have taken of ₹ 1,07,375/- on delayed payment on speculation and F O transactions. Such charges are undisputedly, in the nature of interest. The interest is defined u/s. 2(28A) which means interest payable in any manner in respect of any moneys borrowed or debt incurred (including a deposit, claim or other similar right or obligation) and includes any service, fee or other charge in respect of the moneys borrowed or debt incurred or in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng 31.03.2005 it was ₹ 2,03,179/-. Thus, the reduction in the capital was invested in the shares. The bank loan has not been invested. Even the liabilities of the share broker were outstanding. The CIT(A) after verifying schedule F of the balance sheet consisting of the details of investment and deposits, noted that the assessee has not utilized the OD for the business purposes. Therefore, he upheld the disallowance. 11. We have heard the learned DR. We find that the CIT(A) after appreciating the evidence has given his finding of fact. No contrary evidence was brought to our knowledge or filed before us, which may compel us to take a view against the order of CIT(A). We, therefore, confirm the order of the CIT(A). Thus, this ground .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates