New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (10) TMI 13 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

2016 (10) TMI 13 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT - TMI - Input Tax Credit - discount/incentive received - sale of goods at a rate lower than the price shown in the VAT invoice - same self question decided by the court already - Held that: - once this Court has already taken a view on the self same controversy by various judgments, and particularly when SLP has been dismissed by the apex court, this court is not inclined to take a different view than what has already been taken, particularly when no disti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

3 - Dated:- 17-9-2016 - Jainendra Kumar Ranka, J. For the Petitioner : Tanvi Sahai, Meenal Sahai, RB Mathur For the Respondent : Devendra Kumar, Dinesh Kumar, Deepak Goyal S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 43 of 2014, S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 44 of 2014, S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 45 of 2014, S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 46 of 201, S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 47 of 2014, S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 48 of 2014, S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re carrying on separate business but they sold the goods at a rate lower than the price shown in the VAT invoice keeping in view the discount/incentive received by them from the respective dealers. 2. While the Assessing Officer disallowed the ITC and it was the contention of Revenue that the assessee cannot sell the goods lower than what is shown in the VAT invoice of purchase and simultaneously to claim ITC as per the invoice. However, both the Appellate Authorities have come to a finding that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ve of sale value. 4. Learned counsel for the assessees relied upon a judgment in the case of CTO v. M/s. Hinger Traders [S.B. Civil (VAT) Revision No.160/2012] wherein coordinate Bench of this court at Principal Seat vide judgment dated 16.9.2013 dismissed the petition of Revenue. It is further contended that the Revenue sought to challenge the said judgment of this court before the apex court and the apex court dismissed the SLP vide order and judgment dated 24.3.2014 in Special Leave to Appeal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version