Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise Versus M/s. Union Metal, Shri Sunil Kumar Marwah, partner

2016 (10) TMI 131 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Cenvat demand - no manufacturing activity was noticed by the officers at the time of visit to the factory - partner admitted in his statement that no manufacturing activity took place - no material was purchased by him but cenvat credit was taken on the basis of bills mostly issued by M/s. Jagriti Plastics without receipt of accompanied material - Held that:- from the process of manufacture it is easy to see that the item thinner can easily be made by mixing of various solvents, requiring even n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tigations having been undertaken against M/s. Jagriti Plastics for supply of material and other suppliers. The financial transactions involved in purchasing inputs from M/s. Jagriti Plastics as well as other suppliers have not been looked into. The most pertinent point to investigate would have been to probe cash flow back from the respondent to the supplier, substantiate the fact of non-receipt of inputs. - Revenue's case is totally silent about the sale of finished goods by the respondent. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d in the factory of the assessee, it would be expected from the Revenue to show at least in a few cases, where the inputs have actually been received, if not in the respondent's factory. - The respondents have taken the cenvat credit on inputs but have also cleared finished goods on payment of duty. Even though there is no discussion in the orders of the authorities below, we would expect that the cenvat credit availed on the inputs would also have been debited for making payment at the time .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

V Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) Shri G R Singh, DR for the Appellants Ms Seema Jain, Advocate for the Respondent ORDER Per V Padmanabhan: Two appeals filed by the Revenue against the assessee M/s. Union Metal and Shri Sunil Kumar Marwah, partner are against the order dated 14.5.08 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), New Delhi in which he has set aside the order passed by the original authority dated 21.1.08. 2. The assessee is registered for the manufacture of thinners and phosphate Chemical .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

asis of bills mostly issued by M/s. Jagriti Plastics without receipt of accompanied material. After further investigations, the assessee was served with show cause notice dated 26.3.2007 for disallowing the cenvat credit to the tune of ₹ 34 lakhs approximately. The original authority in his order dated 21.1.08 disallowed the cenvat credit and imposed penalties. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) in his appellate order dated 14.5.08 set aside the demand mainly for the following reasons:- ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rchase of inputs and sale of finished goods to the buyers. 3. Finally, he concluded that the department failed to establish that the assessee has wrongly availed the cenvat credit without physically receiving the inputs. 4. The Revenue has challenged this order of Commissioner (Appeals) mainly on the following points: (i) The statement of Shri Sunil Kumar Marwah dated 23.3.06 to the effect that they had never purchased inputs nor undertaken any manufacturing activity is corroborated by the fact .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e not fit to transport the goods. (iii)The Revenue has also relied upon various case laws to the effect that it is not possible to establish every link in the chain of clandestine activity. 5. Heard Shri G R Singh, learned DR appearing for the Revenue and Ms. Seema Jain, learned advocate for the respondent assessee. 6. The Revenue s case is that no manufacturing activity was noticed by the officers at the time of visit to the factory on 23.3.06. The process of manufacture has been summarized by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mall tank or drum and no electricity connection is necessary. Invoices for purchase of inputs as well as supply of thinners to various buyers were found. As also GRs as well as sales tax payment receipts. Revenue officers during visit found that no manufacturing activity was being undertaken in the factory. From the process of manufacture it is easy to see that the item thinner can easily be made by mixing of various solvents, requiring even no electricity connection. As such, it can not be conc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version