Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT Circle-5 (1) Visakhapatnam Versus P. Rama Chandra Rao,

ITA No.387/Vizag/2009 - Dated:- 7-4-2011 - SHRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BR BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Appellant By: Shri T.H. Lucas Peter, CIT (DR) Respondent By: Shri C. Subramanyam, CA ORDER Per Shri B. R. BASKARAN, Accountant Member: The appeal of the revenue is directed against the order dated 26.05.2009 passed by learned CIT(A), Visakhapatnam and it relates to the assessment year 2006-07. 2. The grounds raised by the revenue give rise to the following two issues: a) Whe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct for M/s Indian Oil Corporation through his own lorries as well as hired lorries. During the course of scrutiny proceedings, the Assessing Officer compared the statement of expenditure furnished for each lorry with the books of accounts maintained by the assessee and noticed that there was excess claim of expenses to the tune of ₹ 6,21,486/- in the books of account vis-à-vis his statement of accounts. The Assessing Officer disallowed the said excess claim. Further the Assessing Of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Assessing Officer disallowed aggregate of both the amounts cited above, i.e. ₹ 85.17 lakhs by invoking provisions of Sec.40(a)(ia) of the Act, as there was a failure on the part of the assessee to deduct tax at source under section 194C of the Act on the hire charges paid by the assessee. The assessee carried the matter in appeal before the learned CIT (A) and obtained relief in respect of both the additions. Hence the revenue is in appeal before us. 4. The learned Departmental Representat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tmental Representative submitted that the first appellate authority has considered fresh evidences submitted for the first time before him without confronting the same with the Assessing Officer. Accordingly he pleaded that the said issue may be set aside to the file of the Assessing Officer. 5. On the contrary the learned Authorised Representative submitted that the issue of deduction of tax at source has been covered in favour of the assessee by the decision rendered by this Bench in the case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Update Alerts     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version