Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Commissioner of Income Tax-6 Versus M/s. Glaxo India Ltd.

Allowability of share issue expenses incurred - whether expenses incurred are for raising capital for purchase of plant and machinery should be capitalized and depreciation be allowed on the same - Held that:- The issues raised herein stand concluded against the Revenue by order of this Court in The Commissioner of Income Tax VI Versus M/s. Glaxo India Ltd. [2013 (2)789 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] - Accrual of Income - Advance license receivable - whether to be taxed in the year in which the benefi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ll as under the duty entitlement pass book, there was no corresponding liability on the customs authorities to pass on the benefit of duty free imports to the assessee until the goods are actually imported and made available for clearance. The benefits represent, at best, a hypothetical income which may or may not materialise and its money value is therefore not the income of the assessee. - Disallowance of penalty paid to Central Excise Authorities- Held that:- The issue raised herein stan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 12th June, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Year 1998-99. (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the share issue expenses incurred or raising capital for purchase of plant and machinery should be capitalized and depreciation be allowed on the same? (ii) Whether on the facts a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

which the benefits actually accrue after the imports are effected and not in the year in which the licence is granted tot he licensee/assessee? (iv) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the interest on DPEA liability is to be allowed as expenditure on year to year basis without appreciating the fact that the interest liability was neither claimed as deduction in the return of income nor claimed as expenses in its books .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that no expenditure was involved in earning dividend and directing to allow deduction u/s 80M on the entire dividend income received, without appreciating the fact that deduction u/s 80M is to be allowed on net dividend only? (vii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that no expenditure was involved in earning dividend and directing to allow deduction u/s 80M on the ent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome Tax Act? (ix) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to consider the disallowance made by him as part of profit of eligible unit on proportionate basis for the purpose of deduction u/s 80I and 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without appreciating the fact that deduction u/s 80I and 80IA of the Act cannot be allowed more than what was claimed by the assessee? (x) Whether on the facts and in the circum .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se and in law, the Tribunal was justified in directing the Assessing Officer that entire Head Office Administrative expenses and interest cost be not allocated tot he Nasik Units for computing the quantum of deduction under Section 80I / 80IA for the Nasik Unit? 2. Re. question nos. (i). (ii), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x) and (xi): (a) Mr. Suresh Kumar learned Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue very fairly states that the issues raised herein stand concluded against the Revenue by ord .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version