Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Kalbhor Construction Co. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune

2016 (10) TMI 458 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Levy of penalty - delay in payment of service tax - appellant had collected the service tax but not deposited the same it time, but deposited before issuance of show cause notice - Held that:- the decision of the Hon'ble High Court [2016 (2) TMI 174 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] has been given in circumstances where the appellant had not filed the requisite periodical returns and the fact of non-payment of service tax came to light only on the result of special investigation. In the instant case, appell .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, 459/12 - A/90611-90612/16/STB - Dated:- 27-9-2016 - Shri M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Shri Raju, Member (Technical) Mr. Patankar, Consultant for the appellant Shri A.B. Kulgod, AC (AR) for the respondent ORDER Per Raju The appellant s were issued show-cause notices for default in payment of duty. The facts of the first case are as follows:- a. Default period : First half of the Financial year 2005-2006 (October 2005 to March 2006) b. Visit of the jurisdictional officers on 01/09/2006 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Q- Apr 2008 June 2008: 6 months and the delay for Q- July 2008 Sept.2008 : 3 months d. Show-cause notice F.no. VGN (30) CCS/012/STC/PI/IV dated 25.03.2010 2. The case was adjudicated by the lower authorities. The original adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of duty and interest and imposed penalty and appropriated the amounts already paid. The notice also imposed penalty under Section 76 and 77. However, no penalty was imposed under Section 78. The matters were agitated by the appel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot present in the instant case and therefore penalty under Section 78 cannot be imposed. He argued that since they had paid the duty voluntarily before issue of show-cause notice the proceedings against them should have been concluded in terms of Section 73(3) of Finance Act, 1994. He further prayed that benefit of waiver of penalty under Section 78 by invocation of section 80. He also sought option to pay reduced 25% as provided under first proviso to Section 78. 4. Ld. AR relied on the impugne .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version