Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

S.K.S. Ispat & Power Limited Versus C.C.E., Raipur

2016 (10) TMI 479 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Denial of CENVAT credit - cenvat credit on iron and steel items (structural steels) used for fabrication of various structures of plants and machineries at site and /or in manufacture of structures supporting capital goods like boiler, coal handling mill, rolling mill, furnaces, conveyors, chimneys etc - inputs under Rule 2(k) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Held that: - the decision in the case of C.C.E., Jaipur vs. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills [2010 (7) TMI 12 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r remanded to the original adjudicating authority who will decide the issue de novo after examining all the records of evidence of use and consumption of subject items, if not already produced, the same are to be produced by the appellant before the original adjudicating authority within one month and thereafter within next two months, the original adjudicating authority shall pass appropriate orders. - Appeal disposed off - decided partly in favor of appellant. - Excise Appeal No. 173 of 20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

valent penalty on the appellant. The impugned order also confirmed duty of central excise amounting to ₹ 60,27,728/- and has also imposed equivalent penalty on the appellant. 3. The appellant has been represented by the ld. Advocate Shri B.L. Narasimhan who in respect of the issue of Admissibility of Cenvat Credit on iron & Steel items like angles, channels, beams, plates etc. used for fabrication of varous structure(s) supporting capital goods like boiler, coal handling mill, rolling .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hannels, beams etc. used in various projects in the factory; and copies of certificates issued by Chartered Accountant and Chartered Engineer were enclosed with the appeal. (iv) In respect of the quantity of the items used in civil or other ineligible activity, cenvat credit was not availed. (v) Cenvat credit was not availed also on quantity of steel used in foundation for erection and installation of various equipments and capital goods. 3.1 The learned Advocate in respect of issue of denial of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re and clearance for captive consumption and the appellant did not manufacture any capital goods as covered under the definition under Rule 2(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules. 4. The ld. Advocate further submitted as follows: (i) Extended period of limitation was invoked alleging suppression of material facts. (ii) Duty demand on iron and steel manufactured and captively consumed denying Notification No.67/95-CE is not sustainable since the details were provided in ER-1 return and details of accounts w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y cannot be operated. (iv) As per Explanation 2 to Rule 2(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002/Rule 2(k) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, inputs include goods used in the manufacture of capital goods which are further used in the factory of manufacturer. Since the impugned goods have been used to manufacture parts/components/ accessories of various capital goods within the factory of the Appellant, as per said explanation, Cenvat credit would be admissible on iron and steel items in the present case. (v .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ELT 301 (Tri-LB)].Since the impugned items have been used for fabrication of various parts / components of specified capital goods, their eligibility for credit is to be decided at the stage before they become part of immovable goods and subsequent use with capital goods which are embedded to earth would be of no consequence. Applying the said ratio, credit taken in the present case is sustainable. (vii) Even though the word plant was omitted from definition of capital goods, since goods like fu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dit will be admissible as capital goods under the category of components, spares and accessories of specified capital goods. (C) The appellant also relied on the following decisions: * JayaswalNeco Ltd. v. CCE, 2015 (319) ELT 247 (SC) * CCE, Jaipur v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd., 2010 (255) ELT 481 (SC) * CCE, Tiruchirapalli v. India Cements Ltd., 2012 (285) ELT 341 (Mad.) * CCE, Tiruchirapalli v. India Cements Ltd., 2014 (305) ELT 558 (Mad.) * CCE v. India Cements Ltd, 2014 (310 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ltd., 2012 (280) E.L.T. 176 (Kar.) * Monnet Ispat& Energy Ltd. v. CCE, 2015 (330) E.L.T. 711 (Tri. - Del.) * The India Cements Ltd. v. CCE, 2015-TIOL-2715-CESTAT-MAD * Omax Auto v. CCE, 2014 (314) E.L.T. 439 (Tri. - Del.) * Jodhpur Alloys Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, 2013 (292) E.L.T. 448 (Tri. - Del.) * CCE v. Hi-Tech Power & Steel Ltd., 2015 (315) E.L.T. 428 (Tri. - Del.) * Simbhaoli Sugars v. CCE, 2016-TIOL-550-CESTAT-ALL * CCE v. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., 2015 (330) E.L.T. 708 (Tri. - Del .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

825 (Tri. - Ahmd.) * SAIL v. CCE, 2008 (222) E.L.T. 233 (Tri. - Kolkata) * Hindustan Copper Ltd. v. CCE, 2006 (206) E.L.T. 276 (Tri. - Del.) * CCE v. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., 2006 (201) E.L.T. 598 (Tri. - Del.) * Tata Engineering And Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. CCE, 2005 (191) E.L.T. 209 (Tri. - Mumbai) 4.1 The Appellant also submits that quantification of duty demand is not correct as submitted in the Appeal Memorandum and substantial duty demand is hit by time bar. Since detailed records wer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l items on the basis of findings of adjudicating authority. (iii) The reliance is placed on the following decisions: * Vandana Global Ltd. vs. C.C.E., Raipur 2010 (253) ELT 440 (Tri-LB). * Daya Sugar vs. C.C.E., Meerut I 2015 (316) ELT 394 (All.) * Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd. vs. C.C.E., Meerut 2016 (334) ELT 58 (All.) * Bharti Airtell Ltd. vs.C.C.E., Pune III 2014 (35) STR 865 (Bom.) * Tower Vision India Pvt. Ltd. vs.C.C.E. Rohtak 2016 TIOL 639 (CESTAT Del.-LB. * Commissioner of Customs and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

steels) used for fabrication of various structures of plants and machineries at site and /or in manufacture of structures supporting capital goods like boiler, coal handling mill, rolling mill, furnaces, conveyors, chimneys etc. The second issue is duty demand on angles, channels, etc. manufactured and captively consumed in fabrication of structures of capital goods where benefit of Notification No.67/95-CE dated 16.3.95 has been denied to the appellant. 7.1 In the case of first issue where cenv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntained in the final product or not and includes lubricating oil, greases, cutting oils, coolants, accessories of the final products cleared along with the final products, goods used as paint, or as packing material, or as fuel, or for generation of electricity or steam used in or in relation to manufacture of final products or for any other purpose used in the factory of production; (ii) all goods, except light diesel oil, high speed diesel oil, motor spirit, commonly known as petrol and motor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(except the exclusions given) are included if they are used in or in relation to the manufacture of final product or for any purpose used in the factory of production. Further, Explanation 2 to Rule 2(k) makes it clear that input would include all such goods used in the manufacture of capital goods which are further used in the factory of the manufacturer. In other words, if certain inputs have been used within the factory of production for manufacturing capital goods and if the said capital goo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

their case. 8. The Revenue has submitted that as per definition of capital goods given in Rule 2(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, iron and steel items (for structural use) like angles, channels, beams etc. have been used in the manufacture of structural items supporting capital goods like boiler, coal handling mills etc.; and these supporting structures cannot be called capital goods under the said definition of capital goods . Revenue further submits that for such inputs i.e. structural steel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nstallation of huge machinery would not be possible and such machinery cannot be operated. 8.1 Revenue further submits taking support from the decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Vandana Global Ltd. 2010 (253) ELT 440 (Tri-LB) and other decisions listed in their written submissions mentioned in the para 5.1 above that the appellant is not eligible for cenvat credit on the findings of the impugned order. The appellant however submits that the submissions and the arguments .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ctures cannot be called capital goods, and/or goods even; therefore, for the said inputs cenvat credit is not admissible. 8.2.1 But we are unable to comprehend that when there are no supporting structures for capital goods like boilers, coal handling mills, how would these capital goods/equipments operate In other words, in order to make such capital goods like boilers, coal handling mills, conveyors etc. fully operational (for further use in manufacture of final products in a factory), supporti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aid structures are specifically meant to make the capital goods like boilers, coal handling mills etc. fully operational and when the said boilers etc. are integral part of the manufacturing operations of steel plant (factory), where iron and steel products are manufactured, one cannot say that subject steel items (structural steels like angles, channels, beams, plates etc.) are not cenvatable items in case of the said steel manufacturing plant /factory. 8.2.2 We emphasise that one cannot be obl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uch essentials in order to make use of said washing machine/T.V. By using same analogy, it is necessary to examine if the subject structural steel items are finally essential accessory to related capital goods or are essential (input) used in or in relation to manufacture of final products or for any other purpose, within the factory of production. Further in terms of the wordings of Explanation 2 to Rule 2(k) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, it is necessary to examine if subject structural steel i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ard the Hon ble High Court s observations in the said case are reproduced below: 7. As far as the other items, namely, Rebar Coils, CTD Bars, TOR Steel and Cement are concerned, as to whether they are capital goods or not, the Tribunal having regard to the law laid down by the Apex Court in Jawahar Mills s case, has liberally construed the above Rule and factually found that these are the items, which are used for the purpose of construction of the plant comprising of concrete foundations, concr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al Excise, Jaipur v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd.). In paragraphs 12 and 13, while applying the user test and following the Jawahar Mills s case, the Apex Court has held that even though steel plates and M.S. Channels used in the fabrication of chimney would fall within the ambit of capital goods . 8.4 Further in the case of of C.C.E., Tiruchirapalli vs. India Cements Ltd. 2014 (305) ELT 558 (Mad.), the assessee was held to be entitled to the claim of modvat credit in the case of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se items as capital goods) are admissible items for cenvat credit. For the present facts also on the issue of admissibility of cenvat credit on the subject structural steel items, we use the same reasoning of applying the user test as mentioned by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills and we hold that subject structural steel items like angles, channels, beams are eligible for cenvat credit here. 8.4.1 Here, we would like to refer to Hon ble Supreme Court .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

manufacturer. The Hon ble Supreme Court in this case inter alia states that the modvatability of an item, and whether the item has been used for capital goods or not would be decided mainly upon user of the said capital goods . In other words, the manufacturer s user of the said capital goods will determine whether the modvat (presently called cenvat credit) could be claimed with reference to the said items. The same user test has been quoted and applied by Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

goods or for bringing about any change in any substance for the manufacture of final product would be Capital goods , and, therefore, qualify for availing Modvat credit. Per clause (b), the components, spare parts and accessories of the goods mentioned in clause (a) used for the purposes enumerated therein would also be Capital goods and qualify for Modvat credit entitlement. Clause (c) makes moulds and dies, generating sets and weigh bridges used in the factory of the manufacturers as capital g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Court in the case of Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills (supra), inter alia observed as under: 12. Inter alia observing that capital goods can be machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances if any of these goods is used for producing or processing of any goods or for bringing about any change in the substance for the manufacture of final product, although this view was expressed in the light of the afore-noted definition of capital goods in the said Rule, which is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s would depend upon the user it is put to. 8.5 We have considered all the submissions along with case laws including Larger Bench decision of CESTAT in the case of Vandana Global (supra), given by the Revenue; however in our considered view , in the light of the Hon ble Supreme Court s decision in the case of M/s Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills (supra) and Hon ble Madras High Court decision in the cases of C.C.E., Tiruchirapalli vs. India Cements Ltd. 2012 (285) ELT 341 (Mad.) and C.C.E., .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version