Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

RAJASTHAN TEXTILE MILLS AND OTHERS Versus CCE. JAIPUR I

2016 (10) TMI 581 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Refund of service tax - services utilized for export purposes - N/N. 41/2007-ST dated 06.10.2007, port services entitled to refund claim - THC charges - bill of loading charges - origin haulage charges - repo charges - CHA services - transportation o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

C.C.E., Jaipur-I [2015 (9) TMI 1281 - CESTAT NEW DELHI], M/s. Shivam Exports, M/s. Mecshot Blasting Equipment (P) Ltd. And M/s. Shree Ram Industries Versus CCE Jaipur [2016 (2) TMI 259 - CESTAT NEW DELHI]. As much as the issue stands decided, the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e is covered by the earlier decision of the Tribunal laying down that the said debit notes would be admissible documents for the purpose of refund. - Matter remanded for grant of refund wherever held admissible - appeal disposed off. - Appeal No. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Wadhwa: All the appeals are being disposed of by a common order as the issue involved in all of them relates to refund of service tax paid on various services utilized for export purposes. Such refund claim is admissible to the assessee in terms of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rejected on the ground that the same do not fall under the category of port services and in as much as only port services are specified in the notification the assessee would not be entitled to refund claim. 3. I find that the issue stands decided t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IOL-2319CESTAT-DEL)]; 4. Vippy Industries Ltd. vs. CCE Indore [2013 (30) STR 238 (Tri-Del)]; 5. Faizan Shoes Pvt Ltd vs CST, Chennai [2014 (34) STR 205 (Tri-Chennai)]; 6. CCE, Surat vs. ABG Shipyard Ltd. [2011 (24) STR 620 (Tri-Ahmd)l; 7. Sunita Hydr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A/51948/2016-CU(DB) dated 25.05.2016 10. Jainson (India) Industries vide Final Order No. ST/A/52070/16-CU(DB) dated 01-06.2016. 4. In as much as the issue stands decided, I hold that the assessee would be entitled to the refund of service tax paid on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on of the Tribunal referred in the proceeding paragraphs laying down that the said debit notes would be admissible documents for the purpose of refund. 6. The refund part also stands denied on the ground that no proof of the payment of the same by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version