New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (10) TMI 652 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH

2016 (10) TMI 652 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH - TMI - CENVAT credit - search of premises - whether denial of CENVAT credit justified on the ground that respondents received only the cevatable invoices without receiving the goods in question? - allegation based on the statement of certain drivers/transporter - Held that: - The said statements of drivers has been controverted by the respondent by producing various vouchers which certified that the respondent have received the inputs but in specific instan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vehicle no. DL 1M-1360, the vehicle is a dumper which can only be used for lifting debris, inputs not transported - credit rightly denied. - In the case of Airvision India Pvt. Ltd., no contrary evidence produced - cenvat credit cannot be denied to Airvision India Pvt. Ltd.. - CENVAT credit denied to M/s Novice Polymers and CENVAT credit to M/s Airvision India Pvt. Ltd. allowed. - Appeal allowed - decided partly in favor of appellant. - E/57445, 57446, 58020, 58099/2013 - Final Ord .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the appellant, the search was conducted on 30.10.09, physical stock, raw material or finished goods were verified. They were found to be tallied. Certain records were resumed and after conclusion of the investigation, it was alleged that the respondents were received only the cevatable invoices without receiving the goods in question. Therefore, the show cause notices were issued to the respondent to deny cenvat credit on the strength of the invoices, consequently, to prospective demand of duty .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

drivers that certain such vehicles are dumpers which were used only for lifting malwa/debris. Certain drivers have stated that their vehicles have no permit for transport outside Delhi. Certain drivers have stated that there were not in Gurgaon on the dates on which their vehicle numbers have been mentioned on the invoices on which credit was availed. Therefore, on the basis of the statements of drivers/transporters which prove that they have not transported the goods to the respondents. In tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ons made by both the sides, I find that the Revenue's a case is that the respondent have not received goods and only received the cenvatable invoices. The allegation is based on that the statement of certain drivers/transporter. The said statements of drivers has been controverted by the respondent by producing various vouchers which certified that the respondent have received the inputs but in specific instances like in the case of truck no. HR-38N-1285 and HR-38M-2282, the vehicles are sta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version