Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The DCIT 22 (3) , Mumbai Versus Shri. Vijay Ravji Gajra

Penalty u/s 271AAA - undisclosed cash credit - Held that- We concur with the Ld. CIT(A)s observation that the undisclosed income of ₹ 3.55 crores representing various items as cited therein are liable to be considered in terms of the provisions of Explanation (a)(ii) to Section 271AAA of the Act. As per the material on record and as observed by the Ld. CIT(A), we find that it is an undisputed fact that the assessee has, during the course of search proceedings, apart from declaring the und .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

come have to be produced to substantiate the source of income; a proximate nature of acquisition would be sufficient. We too, agree with the finding of the Ld. CIT(A) that the A.O has not identified which of the conditions have been violated by the assessee, that invite the levy of penalty u/s 271AAA of the Act in the case on hand; Nor has any reason has been rendered for the levy thereof - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 6261/MUM/2014 - Dated:- 5-10-2016 - SHRI JASON P. BOAZ (AM) AND SH .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

developer. A search and seizure action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted by the I.T. Department in the Gajra group on 19/02/2009, wherein the assessee along with his partner Shri.Ramesh Gajra disclosed collectively additional income of ₹ 15 crores in their individual hands and firm in which he was partner. In the assessee s case the disclosure was as ₹ 4,24,31,099/-. For Asst. year 2009-10, the assessee filed his return of income on 03/05/2010 declaring total income of ₹ 3,57,7 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nce of ₹ 43,49,166/- on account of reduced disclosure of cash credit which was accepted by the Assessing Officer ( AO ). In respect of the difference of ₹ 25,00,000/- on account of Miscellaneous income the assessee submitted that this amount was declared by the assessee during search to cover any shortfall in the declaration made u/s 132(4) of the Act and since later on, at the time of filing of the return of income, it was found that there was no shortfall in the undisclosed income .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eously in this regard. The authorities below have observed that no appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of assessment for Asst. year 2009-10 dt. 03/11/2010 and therefore the matter attained finality. 3.1 The A.O initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AAA of the Act simultaneously in the order of assessment for Asst. year 2009-10 dt. 03/11/2010, requiring the assessee to show cause as to why penalty be not levied there under in the case on hand. In reply dt. 23/05/2011, the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h the conditions specified u/s 271AAA of the Act. 3.2 Aggrieved by the order levying penalty of ₹ 35,58,193/- u/s 271AAA of the Act for Asst. year 2009-10 vide order dt. 30/05/2011, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-33, Mumbai. After considering the submissions put forth by the assessee, the AO s views in the matter and the material on record, the Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order, dt. 15/07/2014, deleted the penalty levied u/s 271AAA of the Act, as he was of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ITA No. 6763/Mum/2011 dt. 10/07/2013. 4.1 Revenue, being aggrieved by the impugned order of the CIT(Appeals)-33, Mumbai dt. 15/07/2014 deleting the penalty of ₹ 35,58,193/- levied u/s 271AAA of the Act for Asst. year 2009-10, has preferred this appeal raising the following grounds:- 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the penalty of ₹ 35,58,193/- levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, witho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

may be necessary. 4.2 The Ld. DR for Revenue was heard in support of the grounds raised (supra), submitting that the only issue challenged was the order of the Ld. CIT(A) deleting the penalty of ₹ 35,58,193/- levied by the A.O u/s 271AAA of the Act for Asst. year 2009-10. According to the Ld. DR, who placed strong reliance on the order of the A.O, the Ld. CIT(A) ought not to have deleted the said penalty as the assessee had failed to discharge its onus to specify and substantiate the mann .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e provisions of sec. 271AAA of the Act, and both specified and substantiate d u/s 132(4) of the Act, the manner and source from which the undisclosed income of ₹ 4,24,31,099/- had been earned before the Addl. DIT (Inv.) Kalyan vide letter dt. 12/04/2009, which item wise break up finds mention at pages 1 and 2 of the order of assessment of for Asst. year 2009-10. It was contended that in view of the above, penalty u/s 271AAA of the Act was not leviable or sustainable in the case on hand and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the record are that in the course of search action in the Gajra group, on 09/02/2009 and thereafter it was, inter alia admitted before the Addl. DIT (Inv), Thane vide letter dt. 12/04/2009 and in the assessee s statement u/s 132(4) of the Act that the declaration/admission of undisclosed income of the assessee in the case on hand for Asst. year 2009-10 was as under:- Sr. No. Description & Details Amount 1 Jewellery ₹ 3,00,000 2 Cash Seizure ₹ 10,00,000 3 Brokerage ₹ 7,50,0 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it by way of loan 3,35,31,933 Total 3,55,81,933 The difference between the declaration u/s 132(4) of the Act and that admitted in the return of income filed was; (i) ₹ 43,49,100/- on accounts of cash credit by way of loan, the assessee s explanation for which was accepted by the A.O; and (ii) an amount of ₹ 25,00,000/- on account of Miscellaneous which was added to the assessee s income when the order of assessment was finalized u/s 153A rws 143(3) vide order dt. 03/11/2010. 4.4.3 Pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re under. On appeal by the assessee, we find that the Ld. CIT(A) after considering the submissions of the assessee, the A.O s views and the material on record, has deleted the penalty levied u/s 271AAA holdings under at paras 2.6 to 2.8 of the impugned order :- 2.6 I have considered the details on record filed by the A.O as well as by the appellant on various dates. I have also perused the assessment order and the impugned penalty order. The first contention of the appellant that the income offe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

find mention in the assessment order date wise. Thereof, this contention of the appellant is not frivolous and deserves to be held as such. 2.7 Coming to the next contention of the appellant it is an undisputed fact that the appellant has during the course of search proceedings declared the income and the manner thereof. This is evident from the perusal of the Assessment Order wherein these facts are recorded. The AO has on page 3 of the assessment order recorded the details of cash credits of & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llant as provided u/s 271AAA and why. He has merely reproduced the conditions u/s 271AAA and made a bald statement that the appellant has not satisfied the conditions. The penalty order seems to have been passed mechanically without dealing with each condition separately. The appellant's case is squarely covered by the decision of the jurisdictional ITAT in the case of M/s Kanakia Spaces Private Limited (supra) wherein the Hon ble ITAT has held as under :- "The fact of the matter is tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The requirement as per' Section (2) of Section 271AAA is only that the manner of earning income should be specified so that undue advantage of telescoping or some other income being brought within the total ambit of undisclosed income surrendered does not happen. From the order of the Ld. A.0 also, it is apparent that the penalty is not levied by him on account of some conviction but has been just levied to complete the proceedings. In fact there are no material facts warranting the levy of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Act read as under:- 271AAA (Penalty where search has been initiated. (1). The Assessing Officer may, notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of this Act, direct that, in a case where search has been initiated under section 132 on or after the 1st day of June, 2007 the assessee shall pay by way of penalty, in addition to tax, if, any, payable by him, a sum computed at the rate of ten per cent of the undisclosed income of the specified previous year. (2) Nothing contained i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1). (4) The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, so far as may be apply in relation to the penalty referred to in this section. Explanation.- For the purposes of this section,- (a) undisclosed income means- (i) any income of the specified previous year represented, either wholly or partly, by any money, bullion, jewellery, or other valuable article or thing or any entry in the books of account or other documents or transaction .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cuments maintained in the normal course relating to the specified previous year which is found to be false and would not have been found to be so had the search not been conducted; (b) specified previous year means the previous year- (i) which has ended before the date of search, but the date of filing the return of income under sub-section(1) of section 139 for such year has not expired before the date of search and the assessee has not furnished the return of income for the previous year befor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT(A), we find that it is an undisputed fact that the assessee has, during the course of search proceedings, apart from declaring the undisclosed income; has also given the detailed break up of the same, item wise and giving the proximate manner in which and source the same have been earned/derived from. This is therefore, in our view, substantiated. The above facts find mention by the A.O in the order of assessment at 2 to 4 thereof, inter alia giving the dates on which these cash credit are .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rendered for the levy thereof. On a careful appreciation of the factual and legal matrix of the case on hand, we are of the considered view that the assessee s case is squarely covered by the decision of the co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of Kanakia Spaces Pvt. Ltd.(supra) wherein the Hon ble Tribunal at paras 3.1 to 4.1 has observed and held as under:- 3.1 ………………………………………&he .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The very fact that the disclosure is made in respect of undisclosed income, all that can be required of an assessee is that the proximate nature of acquisition can be mentioned by him. It cannot be the case that very minute detail thereof would be preserve with evidence which is possible only for the regular income being disclosed by him. The requirement as per Section (2) of Section 271AAA is only that the manner of earning income should be specified so that undue advantage of telescoping or so .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o not see any reason to interfere with the order of CIT(A). The order is in tune with the principles laid down by various co-ordinate Benches and High Courts particularly with reference to disclosure made under section 132(4). In the case of CIT vs. Mahendra C. Shah (299 ITR 305) the Hon ble Gujarat High Court considered similar statement under section 132(4) to grant immunity under section 271(1)(c). The Hon'ble High Court held as under:- When the statement is being recorded by the authoriz .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ulated by the provisions considering the setting in which such statement is being recorded. Secondly, considering the social environment it is not possible to expect from an assessee, whether literate or illiterate, to be specific and to the point regarding the conditions stipulated in the second exception while making statement under section 132(4). Even if the statement does not specify the manner in which the income is derived, if the income is declared and tax thereon paid, there would be su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version