TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 94X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... P-561-VDR-II-2013, dt.13.03.2013, passed by Commissioner (Appeals), C.Ex. & S.Tax, Vadodara. 2. The brief facts of the case in brief are that the Appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Sodium Salt of Trichloro Pyridinol and Trichloro Acetyle Chloride falling under Chapter 29 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Appellants had availed CENVAT Credit of input services in r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. In support of her argument, she referred to the judgment of this Tribunal in the case of M/s Welspun Maxsteel Ltd Vs CCE Raigad - 2012-TIOL-1662-CESTAT- MUM. 4. The learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue reiterates the findings of the learned Commissioner (Appeals). 5. I find that the issue relates to the eligibility of CENVAT Credit of in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|