Home List
← Previous	Next →

2016 (11) TMI 764 - KERALA HIGH COURT

2016 (11) TMI 764 - KERALA HIGH COURT - 2016 (340) E.L.T. 130 (Ker.) - Seizure of three gold bars weighing one kilogram each and Indian currency of ₹ 1,10,00,000/- from the petitioner - Section 110(2) of the Customs Act - Held that: - It is beyond dispute that no notice under clause (a) of Section 124 of the Customs Act in respect of the seizure of the aforesaid goods was issued to the petitioner till date. There is also no case for the respondent that the period fixed for initiating proce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ated any of the provisions therein. - W.P. (C) No. 23764 of 2016 (U) - Dated:- 18-7-2016 - P.B. Suresh Kumar, J. Shri C.P. Mohammed Nias, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Shri Sreelal N. Warrier, Advocate, for the Respondent. JUDGMENT On 4-8-2015, the police officers attached to Iritty Police Station seized three gold bars weighing one kilogram each and Indian currency of ₹ 1,10,00,000/- from the petitioner and produced the same before the jurisdictional Magistrate. On 10-9-2015, the official .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e goods are liable to be returned to him. The petitioner, therefore, seeks appropriate directions to the respondent to return the goods seized from him by the police on 4-8-2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. 3. Section 110(2) of the Customs Act reads thus : Where any goods are seized under sub-section (1) and no notice in respect thereof is given under clause (a) of Section 124 within six months of the seizure of the goods, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X