Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACTO, Flying Squad, Alwar Versus Virendra Singh S/o Dharmpal

2016 (11) TMI 981 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Non service of notice - Rajasthan Tax Board, a statutory body - Held that: - the declaration form ST-18C was filed before the AO himself on a show cause notice and judgment of apex court in State of Rajasthan & Another v. D.P. Metals [2001 (10) TMI 881 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] squarely applies, where it was held that The quantum of penalty under the circumstances enumerated in section 78(5) cannot, in our opinion, be regarded as illegal. The quantum of tax levied by the taxing statute, the cond .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tax Revision Petition No. 471 of 2008 - Dated:- 3-10-2016 - Jainendra Kumar Ranka, J. For the Petitioner : Meenal Ghiya ORDER 1. Though the matter is listed in the category of orders on account of non service of notice on respondent no.2, since respondent no.2 has been made as a party being Rajasthan Tax Board, however, it being a statutory body, service is dispensed with. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on merits also. 3. Brief facts noticed are that vehicle bearing no.RJ02-G-3006 w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994. 4. The same was assailed before the Dy. Commissioner (Appeals) who taking into consideration the fact that the declaration form ST-18C was filed on a show cause notice and the other material also proved that the goods were being carried in a proper manner accordingly deleted the penalty. 5. The Revenue preferred appeal before the Tax Board, who also dismissed the appeal of Revenue mainly relying upon the other facts noticed by the Dy. Com. (Appeals) as wel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tax Board, which needs consideration. 7. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the impugned order. 8. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the declaration form ST-18C was filed before the AO himself on a show cause notice and judgment of apex court in State of Rajasthan & Another v. D.P. Metals (2002) 1 SCC 279, squarely applies, and even otherwise in my opinion, the judgment of this court in the case of Tajiander Pal (supra) is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version