Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Northern India Steel Rolling Mills, JK Jindal & Sons, Naveen Ispat Industries and Punjab Steel Forging & Agro Versus CCE, Chandigarh-I

2016 (11) TMI 1281 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH

CENVAT credit - forged invoices - Held that: - On going through the observation made by this Tribunal, the matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication on the issue. There was no specific direction to the appellants to prove that they have received the goods. In that, circumstance, the argument advanced by the learned AR is not tenable. Further, I find that the statements of the appellants have not been controverted by any cogent evidence. In that circumstance, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pellants - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - E/51090, 51164,52830-52831/2015 - Final Order No. 61264-61267/2016 - Dated:- 29-8-2016 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) Present for the Appellant: Shri Vikrant Kackria, Sudeep Singh, Advocates Present for the Respondent: Shri V.K.Trehan, R.K. Sharma, AR ORDER The appellants are in appeal against the impugned order. 2. As the issue in all these appeals are common, therefore, they are taken up together for disposal by this common or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the basis of investigation, the case made out against the appellants that the dealers have issued invoices to avail inadmissible credit to the appellants. Accordingly, the show cause notices were issued to the appellants to deny the credit to the manufacturers/buyers and forimposition of penalties on all the appellants. The matter was adjudicated and demand was confirmed against the manufacturers/buyers by denying the credit alongwith interest and penalties imposed on all the appellants. Aggrie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

orted to the appellants. Therefore, the credit cannot be denied to the manufacturers/buyers and the penalties are not imposable on the appellants. To support their contention, he relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Sagar Alloys vide Final Order No. 891-894/2009-SM (br) dated 30.6.2009 and Raghav Alloys Ltd. vide Final Order No.1573-1574/2008-SM (Br) dated 27.11.2008. 4. Learned AR opposed the contention of the learned Counsel and submits that the appellants have failed to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reason for ordering de novo consideration of the entire issues. The basic relates to whether the consignments covered by the invoices were delivered to Mandi Gobindgarh based manufacturers namely M/S A.R. Alloys and M/S Northern India Steel Rolling mills or were diverted to Khanna city based re-rollers or to any other parties. M/S A.R. Alloys and Northern India Steel Rolling Mills merely submitted that they have received the consignments covered by the invoices. Undisputedly, the consignments we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version