Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Kavita B. Patil Versus The Income Tax Officer

Addition of unexplained cash deposits in Bank Account - Held that:- In case cash was available with the assessee out of withdrawals made from the bank account, where was the necessity to draw ₹ 1000/- to ₹ 2000/- from day-to-day and even on one particular day, the withdrawal of money by two or three different transactions through ATM. The assessee has deposited sum of ₹ 50,000/- on 26.03.2007 and further sum of ₹ 30,000/- on 30.03.2007, before depositing sum of ₹ 14 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ls made by the husband of assessee. The assessee has filed on record the bank statement of her husband. Undoubtedly, there are cash withdrawals from the said bank account but the withdrawals are similarly made by her husband in the range of ₹ 2000/- to ₹ 5000/- and on some occasions higher withdrawals of ₹ 10,000/- to ₹ 15,000/- has been made. However, the explanation filed by the assessee cannot be accepted in the entirety as the household expenses are also to be met out .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Shri Hari Krishna Respondent by : Shri Anil Kumar Chaware ORDER Per Sushma Chowla, JM This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of CIT(A)-3, Pune, dated 12.04.2016 relating to assessment year 2007-08 against order passed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act ). 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- 1. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of ₹ 2,00,900/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e addition of ₹ 2,00,900/-. The assessee has also raised the issue against interest charged under section 234B and 234C of the Act. 4. Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee had furnished return of income declaring total income of ₹ 2,07,064/-. In response to the notice issued for scrutiny, the assessee herself attended and explained the return and produced the documents / information as called for. The assessee was employed with HDFC Bank Ltd. and derives income from salary .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

00,900/- were treated as unexplained income under section 69A of the Act. 5. Before the CIT(A), the assessee explained that she was working with HDFC Bank and this was her only source of income. The husband of assessee was employed with Citi Bank Group, Pune and it was further claimed by the assessee that her husband s income was about ₹ 8 lakhs and he had drawn certain amounts from Citi Bank account, which were deposited by the assessee in her bank account totaling ₹ 2,00,900/-. Bef .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome cash withdrawals, which in turn, had been utilized for the purpose of cash deposits in the bank account. Another plea raised by the learned Authorized Representative for the assessee in respect of withdrawals made by the husband of assessee totaling ₹ 6,43,200/- and it was pointed out that part of the said amount was utilized by the assessee for deposits into the bank account. The learned Authorized Representative for the assessee also referred to the bank statement filed by the assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

:- Date Amount 21/6/06 69300/- 02/8/06 25000/- 01/2/07 12000/- 05/2/07 14600/- 26/3/07 50000/- 29/3/07 30000/- Total 2,00,900/- 10. The assessee claims that the source of said cash deposits were out of withdrawals made by the assessee and her husband from day-to-day from their respective bank accounts. It was explained by the assessee that she was salaried employee with HDFC Bank and her husband was employee of Citi Bank group and beside the salary income, which was their major source of income, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ATM withdrawals, as against which, sum of ₹ 69,300/- was deposited on 21.06.2006. The assessee at best has explained the availability of ₹ 31,000/- as cash in hand because the earlier withdrawals made by the assessee were too petty. On a particular date, the assessee was sometimes making withdrawals of two different amounts i.e. on 26.04.2006, there was ATM withdrawal of ₹ 1500/ - and another ATM withdrawal of ₹ 400/ -. Similar entries are found on various dates i.e. on 0 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ay-to-day and even on one particular day, the withdrawal of money by two or three different transactions through ATM. The assessee has deposited sum of ₹ 50,000/- on 26.03.2007 and further sum of ₹ 30,000/- on 30.03.2007, before depositing sum of ₹ 14,600/- on 05.02.2007, against which there were no cash withdrawals in intervening dates. The availability of cash in the hands of assessee in these circumstances is thus, doubted except as referred in the paras above that the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version