Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Ronn Inn Bar and Restaurant Versus Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes, Vtk-1, Gandhinagar Bengaluru

Valuation - sale turnover - Section 62(6) of the KVAT Act - cost of the sale of items, other than liquor, would be approximately 50% and accordingly, the tax was assessed and penalty was also imposed at the rate of 10% - jurisdiction of revisional authority - Held that: - The records show that the Assessing Officer assessed at the rate of 50% of the total sales without considering any margin of profit whereas the first appellate authority assessed at 10% by accepting the exempted figure of sales .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the factual conclusion as to whether figures arrived at by the assessing officer was correct or not and consequently, the finding recorded is without proper reasons being assigned by the revisional authority - the impugned order passed by the revisional authority is set aside and the matter is remanded to the revisional authority on the limited point of examination about the proportion of sale of food and drink items which is subject to VAT. After the aforesaid exercise is undertaken, the appro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

subject to final order which may be passed by the revisional authority. - Appeal disposed off - decided partly in favor of appellant, only on the issue of attachment of bank property. - STA No. 124/2016 - Dated:- 1-4-2016 - MR. JAYANT PATEL AND MRS. B.V. NAGARATHNA JJ. APPELLANT: (BY SRI.MALLAHARAO. K, ADV.) RESPONDENTS: (BY SRI. K.M. SHIVAYOGI SWAMY, AGA) JUDGMENT JAYANT PATEL J. The present appeal is directed against order dated 30.11.2015 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Commercia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the place of business of the appellant in the name and style of M/s. Ronn Inn Family Restaurant . At that time the Manager Sri. Thomas K. George, was present. His statement was recorded of providing liquor as well as vegetarian and non-vegetarian food to its customers. Certain bills were also recovered. On 2.2.2013 the third respondent proposed to levy tax on the basis of the inspection report and therefore, issued notice. On 30.8.2013, the third respondent passed the order of assessment, on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mately 10% of the total sale. The first appellate authority accepted the figure submitted by the appellant for the sale of liquor as well as for sale of food items and ultimately partly allowed the appeal by modifying the order of assessment. Against the said order of the first appellate authority, the matter was taken up in revision under Section 64(1) of the KVAT Act. The revisional authority found that the exercise of power by the first appellate authority was without proper determination and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Government Advocate for the respondent. 4. As such, the reasoning of the revisional authority is recorded at Para 4 and on perusal thereof shows that the revisional authority is right to the extent that the first appellate authority, without verifying the correctness of the sale of food and drinks ought not to have accepted the figure submitted by the appellant. But, it further appears that the revisional authority has not recorded reasons as to why the determination of sales turnover of food a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

authority assessed at 10% by accepting the exempted figure of sales of liquor. Since the judicial scrutiny of the present appeal insofar as this Court is concerned has to be limited to the question of law and the fact finding inquiry cannot be undertaken by this Court. We find that the matter should be relegated to the revisional authority to undertake such exercise as it is the ultimate fact finding authority. Hence, we find it appropriate to interfere with the order of the revisional authority .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version