GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (12) TMI 699 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (12) TMI 699 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Benefit of Notification No. 25/99-Cus dated 28.2.1999 - concessional rate of duty on ‘Strontium Carbonate’ falling under Chapter 28 used in manufacture of “Glass Shells/Parts for Colour Picture Tubes” - certificate in terms of Rule 4 of the said Rules - Held that: - Exhibit –‘H’ of the appeal memorandum is a letter of the appellant addressed to the Dy. Commissioner of Customs, wherein they have claimed that they had sought exemption under Notification No .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

C/488/05 - ORDER No.A/93858/16/CB - Dated:- 15-11-2016 - Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) And Shri Raju, Member (Technical) Shri Yogesh S Patki, Advocate, for Appellant Shri M.K. Mall, Asstt. Commissioner (AR), for Respondent Per: Raju This appeal has been filed by the appellant, M/s Videocon International Ltd. The appellant imported certain goods and claimed benefit of Notification No. 25/99-Cus dated 28.2.1999. The said notification provided for concessional rate of duty on Strontium Carbon .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

are in appeal before this Tribunal. 2. Learned Counsel for the appellant argued that they had filed a Bill of Entry for clearance of goods claiming the benefit of Notification No. 25/99-Cus. He stated that they have been claiming the said benefit for such product earlier to the impugned Bill of Entry and later also and the same has been allowed to them. He argued that in the instant case, they had obtained a certificate from the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner on 13.12.2004. He argued that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nal. 3. Learned AR relied on the impugned order. 4. We have gone through the rival submissions. We find that though the learned Counsel asserted that they had claimed the benefit of Notification No. 25/99-Cus in the Bill of Entry, a perusal of the said Bill of Entry show that instead of Notification No. 25/99, the benefit of Notification No. 5/2004-Cus has been claimed. Thus, it can be seen that there is no claim for Notification No. 25/99-Cus. However, it is seen from Exhibit E of the appeal pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version