TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 1109X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... take up the Applications on out of turn basis, as it is not known about the procedure followed by the first respondent and how many Revision Applications are listed before the first respondent and as to whether the first respondent is regularly hearing the Revision Applications. Petitioner pleaded to atleast as to when the Revision Applications will be taken up for hearing - this plea was consi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Petition the petitioner seeks for an innocuous relief to direct the first respondent, who is the Revisional Authority to take up the Revision Applications filed by them, challenging the orders passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Chennai, the second respondent, dated 14.10.2014. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders passed by the second respondent, rejecting the claim ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ings dated 13.02.2015, emanated from the Office of the first respondent, it is seen that the Revision Applications were not registered only for the reason that the Court fee Stamps of ₹ 5/- have not been affixed. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the defect has been rectified and necessary Court fee stamps have been affixed. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted representati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vision Applications will be taken up for hearing. 7. This plea seems to be reasonable and definitely the petitioner should know as to what is the stage of all the Revision Applications and as to when the Revision Applications are likely to be heard, as the first respondent has not given any reply to any of the representations given by the petitioner. 8. In the light of the above, there will ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
