Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (12) TMI 1517

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... owed - decided in favor of appellant. - Central Excise Appeal No. 400 of 2011 - 55978/2016 - Dated:- 20-12-2016 - Dr. Satish Chandra, President And Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Technical Member Shri Ashish Vaish, Advocate for the appellant Shri Yogesh Agarwal, A.R. for the Respondent -Revenue ORDER Per Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra The present appeal is filed against the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.352/2010 dated 28.10.2010 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Meerut II. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of writing and printing papers failing under Chapter 48 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 3. In the instant case, the main issu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Purolator India vs. C.C.E., Delhi III 2015 (323) ELT 227 (SC), wherein the Supreme Court observed as under: 6. When it came to cash discount, the Tribunal [2005 (182) E.L.T. 385 (Tri.-Del.)] upheld the finding of the Commissioner on the following basis :- 10. Regarding cash discount, it is not in dispute that the duty has been demanded in respect of cash discount which was not actually passed on to the customers. The learned Advocate has relied upon the decision in Pace Marketing Specialties Ltd., supra, wherein it has been held by the Tribunal that cash discount is a discount allowed for prompt payment for the goods and when this discount is reduced from the invoice price, transaction value at .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a case where the goods are sold by the assessee, for delivery at the time and place of the removal, the assessee and the buyers of the goods are not related and the price is the sole consideration for the sale, be the transaction value. Thus in the present matter, the value for the purpose of Section 4 shall be the transaction value which has been defined in clause (d) of sub-section(3) of Section 4 of the Act as under :- transaction value means the price actually paid or payable for the goods, when sold, and includes in addition to amount charged as priced, any amount that they buyer is liable to pay to, or on behalf of, the assessee, by reason of, or in connection with the sale, whether payable at the time of sale or at any other ti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... goods, the matter is remanded to the jurisdictional Adjudicating Authority for re-adjudication in terms of our direction. We leave the issue regarding imposition of penalty open to be decided by the Adjudicating Authority. 7. Shri Lakshmikumaran, learned counsel for the appellant, has argued that Section 4 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 as amended in 2000, has made no change in the situation qua cash discount as it obtained under the old Section 4. According to him, what has to be seen in order to arrive at the correct value of excisable goods under Section 4 is such value at the time of removal, and this being so under both the old Section and the new Section, cash discount has to be allowed as has been held in Union of I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates