TMI Blog2017 (1) TMI 335X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... - decided in favor of petitioner. - W.P.Nos.2799 and 2800 of 2016 and WMP Nos.2330 and 2331 of 2016 - - - Dated:- 14-12-2016 - Rajiv Shakdher, J. For the Petitioner : Mr.Ramani, Senior Counsel for M/s.B.Raveendran For the Respondent : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai ORDER 1. These are two writ petitions filed to assail the Assessment Order dated 31.12.2015, and the Rectification Order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , concedes that even now all statutory forms and documents have not been submitted, though, the petitioner did appear before the respondent on 10.02.2016, and submitted some statutory forms and documents. 3.1. Learned counsel, therefore, submits that further time be granted to submit necessary statutory forms and documents, as these were being received, virtually in instalments by the petitione ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ugned Assessment Order and the Rectification Order, passed by the respondent; which has, inturn, led to the institution of the instant writ petitions. 5. Mr.Kanmani Annamalai, who appears for the respondent, says, if, the relevant C Forms and H Forms are filed and the difference in the figures appearing in the audit report (as available in the form WW and the monthly returns) is explained, the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... proximate to the date fixed hereinabove. 6.4. The respondent, will, thereafter, pass a fresh assessment order, after taking into account, the material filed and the explanation given, with regard to the difference in figures, as adverted to above. 6.5. The needful will be done by the respondent, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. 6.6. Res ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
