New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (1) TMI 567 - ITAT COCHIN

2017 (1) TMI 567 - ITAT COCHIN - TMI - Exemption u/s 80P - denial of claim on belayed filing of return by the assessee - Held that:- The belated filing of return of income by the assessee does not disentitle it from the benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Act. See KARUVANTHIRUTHY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD Versus THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO. 2 (3)[2016 (6) TMI 1155 - KERALA HIGH COURT] - Further, the assessee, in the instant case, is a primary agricultural credit society registered .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, stating that the assessee is a primary agricultural credit society, to hold that the assessee is entitled to the benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA No. 395/Coch/2014 - Dated:- 3-1-2017 - Shri George George K, Judicial Member Assessee By : Sh A V Muraleedharan Revenue By : Sh A Dhanaraj, SR DR ORDER Per George George K, JM This appeal is restored to the Tribunal by the Hon ble Kerala High Court vide judgme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

9 or 142(1) of the Act and hence, the Assessing Officer proceeded to initiate best judgment assessment u/s 144 of the Act as per the notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer called for details, which were required by her to complete the assessment u/s 144 of the Act. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee filed a return of Income on15.2.2013, which was beyond the time allowed u/s 139 and the time given in notice u/s142(1) and, therefore, the Asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent order by following the order of the Cochin Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Kadachira Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs ITO ( 153 TTJ 129(Cochin). 4. Aggrieved by the above order of the CIT(A), the assessee preferred appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal vide order dated 5.12.2014 disposed off the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal held that since the return was not filed within the time prescribed u/s 139(1)or u/s 139(4), the assessee was not entitled to the benefit of deduction u/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ur of the assessee. The Hon ble High Court had held that the Tribunal was not justified in denying the benefit of exemption u/s 80P of the Act on the mere ground of belated filing of return of income. The Hon ble High Court was considering the following substantial question of law: B Whether the Tribunal is justified in denying the exemption u/s 80P of the I T Act 1961 on the mere ground of belayed filing of return by the assessee? C. Whether a return filed by the assessee beyond the period stip .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ection 142 (1) or section 148, as the case may be. There are no cases among these appeals where returns were not filed. There are cases where claims have been made along with the returns and the returns were filed within time. Still further, there are cases where returns were filed belatedly, that is to say, beyond the period stipulated under sub section 1 or 4 of section 139; and there are also returns filed after the period with reference to sections 142(1) and 148 of the I T Act. 19. Section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

his is so because, the inhibition against allowing deduction is worded in quite similar terms in sections 80A(5) and 80AC, of which section 80A(5) is a provision inserted through the Finance Act 33/2009 with effect from 1.4.2013 after the insertion of section 80AC as per the Finance Act of 2006 with effect from 1.4.2006. This clearly evidences the legislative intendiment that the inhibition contained in sub section 5 of section 80A would operate by itself. In cases where returns have been filed, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

without saying that the claim for exemption will also stand effectuated as a claim duly made as part of the returns so filed, for due consideration. 21 When a notice under section 142(1) is issued, the person may furnish the return and while doing so, could also make claim for deduction referable to section 80P. Not much different is the situation when pre-assessment enquiry is carried forward by issuance of notice under section 142 (1) or when notice 1 s issued on the premise of escaped assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version