Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Central Office Mewar Palace Organization Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Joint Commissioner of Income-Tax, Range-2 Udaipur And M/s Central Office Mewar Palace Organization Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Applicability of the provisions of Section 43B (b) - whether the provisions of Section 43B as it stands after deletion second proviso thereto by Finance Act, 2003, permitting certain deductions on actual payment, can be applied for allowing the deductions in respect of the employee’s contribution towards the relevant fund or funds received by the assessee not credited to the employee’s account on or before the due date as contemplated under explanation attached to Section 36 (1) (va) but is actu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ay of contribution’ to any provident fund, superannuation fund or gratuity fund or any other fund for the welfare of the employees. As discussed hereinabove, under the relevant statutes, both the employer’s contribution and employee’s contribution is required to be paid by the employer before the due date and therefore, the expression ‘sum payable by the assessee as an employer by way of contribution’ as used in Section 43B (b) cannot be given restricted meaning as suggested by the Revenue so as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

date applicable in his case for furnishing the return of the income under sub-section (1) of Section 139 in respect of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred as aforesaid and the evidence of such payment is furnished by the assessee alongwith such return. - The contention sought to be raised by the Revenue that the question with regard to entitlement of the assessee for deduction in respect of the employee’s contribution under Section 43B has not been dealt wi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Mr.N.K.Jain For the Respondent : Mr.K.K.Bissa JUDGMENT Per Hon ble Mr. Sangeet Lodha, J. 1. These two appeals arising out of the order dated 19.12.07 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur in Income Tax Appeal No.131/JDPR/2005 and 159/JDPR/2007 for the Assessment Year 2001-02 and 2002-03 respectively, involving common question of facts and law, were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The facts relevant are: The appellant assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt fund under the relevant statute, however, the amount was actually paid by the assessee before the due date applicable in its case for furnishing the return of income under sub-section (1) of Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( for short the Act ) in respect of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred and the evidence of such payment was furnished alongwith the return. 3. The Assessing Officer vide assessment order dated 23.3.04 disallowed the deduction claim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7; 6,35,092/-. 4. Aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], Udaipur. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal vide order dated 4.1.05. 5. Aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT (A), the assessee preferred second appeal before the ITAT. After due consideration, the ITAT allowed the appeal vide order dated 23.6.06, holding that the amendment in proviso to Section 43B of the Act made vide Finance Act, 2003 is retrospective and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sing Limited, (2003) 183 CTR 322. Relying upon the said decisions, the ITAT recalled the order dated 23.6.06 and restored the appeal to its original number. 6. After re-hearing, vide order dated 19.12.07, the ITAT sustained disallowance in respect of employee s contribution but allowed the deduction towards employer s contribution observing that assessee was entitled to claim benefit under Section 43B of the Act, keeping in view the fact that it has contributed to PF before filing of the return. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) (x), can also be said to fall within the expression mentioned in Section 43B(b) as sum payable by the assessee as an employer . 9. Learned counsel Mr.N.M.Ranka, Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants contended that in view of amendment made in Section 43B, vide Finance Act, 2003, by which the second proviso to Section 43B stands deleted, the deduction has to be allowed even in respect of employee s contribution, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 36(1) (va) and explanatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r impugned passed by the ITAT is no more res integra. In support of the contention, learned counsel also relied upon the decisions of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the matter of CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd. (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC) and CIT vs. Vinay Cement Ltd., (2009) 313 ITR-St.1 and the decisions of Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. Sabari Enterprises , (2008) 298 ITR 141, Gauhati High Court in CIT vs. George Williamson (Assam) Ltd. , (2006) 284 ITR 619 , Uttrakhand High Court in CIT vs. Desh Rak .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the return under Section 139 of the Act, the deduction has wrongly been disallowed by the ITAT. In support of the contention, learned counsel has relied upon a decision of the Karnataka High Court in the matter of Essae Teraoka P. Ltd. vs. D.C.I.T. , (2014) 366 ITR 408. 10. On the other hand, the counsel appearing for the Revenue submitted that as per provisions of Section 2(24)(x) of the Act, any sum received by the assessee from his employees as contribution to any provident fund or superannu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ate by which assessee is required as an employer to credit the employee s contribution to the employee s account in the relevant fund under the relevant statute. Learned counsel submitted that Section 36 (1) (va) and Section 43B (b) operate in different fields and therefore, the contention sought to be raised that the expression contribution used in provisions of Section 43B (b) refers to employer s contribution and employee s contribution both is absolutely fallacious. Learned counsel submitted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the matter of Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin vs. Merchem Ltd. , (2015) 378 ITR 443, learned counsel submitted that if the contention raised on behalf of the assessee is accepted it will render the explanation attached to Section 36 (1) (va) redundant. Learned counsel submitted that both the provisions operating in different fields have to be given effect to and therefore, the assessee having failed to deposit the employee s contribution towards PF and ESI before the due date i.e. the date by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ally dealt with by the various High Courts and therefore, the contention of the Revenue that the question arising in the present appeals is not dealt with by various High Courts specifically is absolutely devoid of any merit. Learned counsel reiterated that a bare perusal of the decision of this court in State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur s case (supra) reveals that the question of law arising in the instant appeals already stand decided after due consideration. Learned counsel submitted that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he provisions of ESI Act or any other fund for welfare of such employee shall stand included within the income of the assessee by virtue of provisions of Section 2(24)(x) of the Act. However, while computing income chargeable to income tax under the head Profit and Gains of Business and Profession in terms of Section 28 of the Act, any sum received by the assessee as aforesaid which is treated to be his income under Section 2 (24)(x) of the Act shall be liable to be deducted under Section 36 (1) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Section 36(1) (va) of the Act in computing the income referred to under Section 28 of the Act, in respect of the sum received as employee s contribution if he has not credited the said sum to the employee s account in the relevant fund or funds on or before the due date mentioned in explanation to Section 36 (1) (va) of the Act. 14. But then, the question which arises for consideration in these appeals is whether the provisions of Section 43B as it stands after deletion second proviso thereto by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Section 139 in respect of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred and the evidence of such payment is furnished by the assessee alongwith such return. 15. It is to be noticed that Section 43B, a non obstante clause, shall be operative irrespective of other provisions of the Act in respect of the deductions specified, which are otherwise allowable under the Act. As per clause (b) of Section 43B read with proviso to Section 43B, any sum payable by the assessee as a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alongwith such return. 16. In the instant cases, it is not disputed that the assessee has deposited the employee s contribution and employer s contribution both in respect of the liability incurred in the previous year but the contention of the Revenue is that the employee s contribution to the relevant funds is not covered by clause (b) of Section 43B and therefore, the ITAT has erred in allowing the deduction in respect thereof invoking the provisions of Section 43B. 17. It is pertinent to no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ibution payable by the employee paid by the employer or a contractor is recoverable by means of deductions from the wages of the employee and not otherwise. But in any case, the payment of employee s contribution by the employer on or before the due date as specified under the relevant statute is not dependent upon the actual deduction from the employee s wages, by the employer or the contractor who in its turn is required to pay the amount deducted to the principal employer. Similarly, as per p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

employer is entitled to recover from employee the employee s contribution by deduction from his wages and in case of an employee employed through an immediate employer, as per provisions of Section 41 of the ESI Act, the principal employer is entitled to recover the amount of employer s contribution as well as employee s contribution from the immediate employer either, by deduction from any amount payable or as debt payable by the immediate employer. But in any case, both under PF fund and ESI .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

te that the clause (b) thereof refers to sum payable by the assessee as an employer by way of contribution to any provident fund, superannuation fund or gratuity fund or any other fund for the welfare of the employees. As discussed hereinabove, under the relevant statutes, both the employer s contribution and employee s contribution is required to be paid by the employer before the due date and therefore, the expression sum payable by the assessee as an employer by way of contribution as used in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

yee s contribution, if the same is actually paid by the assessee on or before the due date applicable in his case for furnishing the return of the income under sub-section (1) of Section 139 in respect of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred as aforesaid and the evidence of such payment is furnished by the assessee alongwith such return. 19. Having gone through the decisions cited at the bar, we are of the opinion that the contention sought to be raised by the Re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Jaipur s case (supra), while specifically dealing with the question with regard to the entitlement of the assessee for deduction in respect of the employee s contribution to PF fund paid beyond the due date as mentioned in explanation to Section 36(1)(va) of the Act, a Bench of this court relying upon the decisions of Supreme Court in Alom Extrusions Ltd. s case (supra) and Vinay Cement s case (supra), categorically held that contributions to provident fund, contributory provident fund and gener .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Section 36 (1)(va) read with Section 2(24) (x) and Section 43B of the Act, held that the provisions of Section 43B (b) clearly provides that notwithstanding anything contained in the other provisions of the Act including Section 36(1) clause (va) of the Act, even prior to insertion of that clause the assessee is entitled to get statutory benefit of deduction. The court observed that the explanation to clause (va) of Section 36(1) of the Act further makes it very clear that the amount actually pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n Desh Rakshak Aushdhalaya Ltd s case (supra), the Uttrakhand High Court while dealing with the question regarding the entitlement of the assessee for deduction of the amount deposited in relation to employee s contribution towards provident fund with delay, upheld the order of the ITAT deleting the addition made in this regard by the AO, relying upon the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the matter of Allied Motors Private Limited vs. CIT (1997) 224 ITR 677 (SC), holding that the deletio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as mentioned in Section 36(1)(va), is the due date as mentioned in Section 43B(b) i.e. payment of contributions made to the provident fund authority any time before filing of the return for the year in which the liability to pay accrued alongwith evidence to establish payment thereof. 25. In Nexus Computers Pvt. Ltd. s case (supra), the Madras High Court while relying upon the decision of Hon ble Supreme Court in rejecting SLP by a speaking order against the judgment of Gauhati High Court in Vi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ovisions are made under the Provident Fund Act as well as ESI Act. The court held that in so far as Income Tax Act, 1961 is concerned, the assessee can get benefit of deduction if the actual payment is made before filing the return as per the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Vinay Cement s case (supra). 27. In Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd. s case (supra), the Karnataka High Court held that contribution used in clause (b) of Section 43B of the Act means the contribution of the employer and t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t stood prior to the amendment and Sec.36(1)(va) Explanation 1 thereto r/w Sec.2(24)(x) are considered together, it is clear that they operate in different fields. So far as the employee s contribution received is concerned, it should have been paid on or before the due date prescribed under the relevant statutes. Then again the learned counsel contended that on a reading of Sec.43B(b), any sum payable by the assessee as an employer by way of contribution to any provident fund meant payment of b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o deface Sec.36(1)(va) and the Explanation thereto from the Income Tax Act. Thus, it means that both provisions are operative and the contributions have to be paid in accordance with the mandate contained under Sec.36(1) (va) and Explanation thereto and under Sec.43B, respectively. 29. In George Williamson (Assam) Ltd. s case (supra), while considering the question of law raised regarding interpretation of clause (b) of Section 43B of the Act, read with second proviso to said section and clause .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version