Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Supertech Ltd. Noida Versus The Commissioner, Commercial Tax, U.P. Lucknow

Works contract - demand of tax on in respect of goods utilized for construction of flats - reliance was placed in the case of K. Raheja Development Corporation Vs. State of Karnataka, [2005 (5) TMI 7 - Supreme Court], as well as judgment in M/S. Larsen and Toubro Limited and another Vs. State of Karnataka and another [2013 (9) TMI 853 - SUPREME COURT], to demand tax. - Held that: - the ownership of land is with the builder itself, and there is no development agreement entered into by the bu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

into existence. The Tribunal being the highest Court of fact was expected to have examined the nature of transaction itself, only after analyzing the clauses of agreement entered into between the assessee and prospective allottee, a finding of works contract could have been returned. - It seems that Tribunal did not deal with the factual issues relating to transaction itself, as it was under the belief that the ratio of law laid down in K. Raheja Development Corporation as well as M/S. Lars .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t liable to be sustained. - Order of Tribunal do not sustain - matter on remand. - Sales/Trade Tax Revision No. 2, 3 of 2017 - Dated:- 6-1-2017 - Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J. For the Applicant : Suyash Agarwal,Sri Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal For the Opposite Party : C.S.C. ORDER 1. These two revisions have been filed under Section 58 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, arising out of assessment proceedings for the year 2010-11 and 2011-12. The assessee company is a developer/builder, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The department as well as the Tribunal for the purposes of coming to such conclusion have relied upon judment of the Apex Court in K. Raheja Development Corporation Vs. State of Karnataka, reported in 2005 (5) SCC 162, as well as judgment in M/S. Larsen and Toubro Limited and another Vs. State of Karnataka and another, reported in 2013 U.P.T.C. 1277. The Tribunal while affirming demand of tax from the assessee has virtually followed the aforesaid two judgments, in order to hold the revisionist .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

builders' agreement for the purposes of raising construction with the object of transferring it to the prospective buyers. In the facts of these two cases, it is also noticed that rights in the land were also transferred to the prospective buyers. It is in that context that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been pleased to hold that the contract for raising construction with object of transferring it to the ultimate purchaser constituted a works contract, so as to attract liability of tax. H .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed in 2012 (1) SCC 656, it is settled that transfer of immovable property can only be by way of registered transfer deed. It is stated that such aspects have clearly been omitted from consideration by Tribunal. Learned counsel further submits that facts and circumstances relating to the transaction between the parties have not been given due consideration by the Tribunal, and there is an apparent failure on part of Tribunal to deal with issues raised and pressed before it, which renders the orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cumstances of the present case, a works contract had come into existence, and the goods and materials used in connection with such contract were liable to be taxed, in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, and have perused the materials brought on record. 5. The order of Tribunal notices the contentions raised on behalf of assessee, and by the order under challenge holds the assessee liable to payment of tax. The entire discussion and finding contained in the orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oods and materials used for raising of construction. Second paragraph deals with payment of higher tax on account of alleged profits to be earned on account of transfer of such constructions. In the last paragraph, the Tribunal holds that there was no contract for sale of Earth, and therefore, levy of tax on such count has been held to be bad. 6. The facts, which have given rise to passing of the judgment by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in K. Raheja Development Corporation (supra), have been no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d/or commercial complexes they enter into Agreements of Sale with intended purchasers. The Agreements would provide that on completion of the construction the residential apartments or the commercial complex would be handed over to the purchasers who would get an undivided interest in the land also. The owners of the land would then transfer the ownership directly to the society which is being formed under the Karnataka Ownership Flats (Regulation of Promotion of Construction, Sales, Management .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s, is essentially a question of fact, which would depend upon the nature of transaction, resorted to between the parties. The assessee in the facts of the present case had alleged that it was the owner of the land, and that the constructions were raised by it, and at the stage of raising of such construction, no right is created in prospective purchaser either over the land or the constructions. Various clauses of the agreement entered into by the builder with the allottee were referred to befor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

returned. It is to be noticed that there existed difference in the facts of the present case viz-a-viz K. Raheja Development Corporation (supra) and M/S. Larsen and Toubro Limited (supra). It was also observed therein that rights were also created in respect of immovable property in favour of the allottees. In the facts of the present case, the revisionist's plea is that no right in the immovable property is created in favour of allottee, and it was otherwise impermissible in view of the ra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version