Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT-4 (1) (1) , Mumbai Versus Interactive Brokers (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Disallowance of mark to market (MTM) loss - Held that:- We find that the issue stands decided in favour of the assessee by the Tribunal in the matters relied upon by the AR. It is found that in the of the Kotak Mahindra Investment Ltd. (2013 (7) TMI 355 - ITAT MUMBAI ), the Tribunal has held that M T M losses have be allowed. We do not find any infirmity in the order of the FAA. So, respectfully, following the orders of the Tribunal, we decide issue against the AO. - Disallowance under secti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eal in favour of the assessee. - Disallowance of depreciation - AO held that assessee was not the owner of the assets, that it had not produced any documentary evidence to prove the payment was made by it, that it was not eligible for claiming depreciation - Held that:- We find that the group concern of the assessee had purchased computers/computer related accessories in Hong Kong, that the foreign-entity had made the initial payment, that the goods were shipped to India, that assets are app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mber Revenue by : Shri K. Mohandas - DR Assessee by : Shri Neeraj Seth. ORDER Per Rajendra A. M. Challenging the order dated 12/12/2014 of the CIT(A)-9Mumbai, the Assessing Officer (AO) and the assessee have filed cross-appeals for the year under consideration. Assessee-company, engaged in the business of securities trading and broking, filed its return of income on 30/09/ 2009, declaring total income of ₹ 37. 38 crores. The AO completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Act, on 04/09/2013 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. In its reply dated 25/02/2013, the assessee contended that it followed mercantile system of accounting and had anticipated losses at the year end with respect to equity index/stock future in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Accounting Standards, that loss suffered by the assessee could not be termed as notional/contingent loss. Referring to the case of Woodward Governor India (P) Ltd. , the AO held that mark to market transactions had to be given peculiar treatment, that as pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s was nothing but a provision of contingent loss, that same could not be allowed as deduction in computing the income for the year under appeal, that future contracts for purchase of derivates were not accounted for as purchases in the books of accounts, that same were not part of stock in trade, that the real income theory would also not be applicable, that the expenditure was not in the nature of an ascertain/liability/expenditure. Accordingly, the provision on account of MTM loses of ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under the head MTM losses. 4. During the course of hearing before us, the Departmental Representative (DR) supported the order of the AO. The Authorised Representative (AR) relied upon the cases of Centrum Broking Ltd. (70 SOT 389) & Kotak Mahindra Investment Ltd. (59 SOT 4). 5. We find that the issue stands decided in favour of the assessee by the Tribunal in the matters relied upon by the AR. It is found that in the of the Kotak Mahindra Investment Ltd. (supra), the Tribunal has held that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Act, that in the computation of income it had not made any dis - allowance on account of expenses incurred towards earning such exempt income. He directed the assessee to explain as to why the provisions of section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962(Rules)should not be applied. Vide its letter 14/02/2013 the assessee stated that it had earned dividend income from the shares that were held stock in trade, that it was engaged predominantly buying & selling of shares and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he previous year, made an addition of ₹ 6. 43 lakhs(. 5% of the average of the investment). 7. During the appellate proceedings, the assessee made submissions before the FAA and relied upon the cases of Hero Cycles Ltd. (322 ITR 513), Yetish Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. (129 ITD 237)and Ganjam Trading company Ltd (ITA 3724/MUM/2005). After considering the submissions of the assessee and the assessment order, the FAA held that disallowance made by the AO was in order for the reasons mentioned .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the exempt income. In the case before us, the AO/FAA has not proved that stocks were held by the assessee as investment or that it had claimed by any expenditure for earning the tax free income. Therefore, reversing the order of the FAA, we decide the first ground of appeal in favour of the assessee. 9. Second Ground is about disallowing deprecation of ₹ 10. 63 lakhs. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that assessee had claimed depreciation on certain assets which were purch .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not be disallowed. Vide its letter dated 07/03/2013, the assessee stated that it had acquired certain assets through its group concern, that a copy of the fixed asset invoice was already filed, that the foreign group - company has made the initial payment on behalf of the assessee, that subsequently a debit note on the assessee was raised, that assets were owned by the assessee and were used during the year under consideration. The AO held that assessee was not the owner of the assets, that it h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version