Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (1) TMI 1025

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... annot be disputed under the facts. There is no reason why such an amount should be retained by the 3rd respondent - refund allowed - petition allowed - decided in favor of petitioner. - W.P.(C).No.30472 of 2015 - - - Dated:- 14-12-2016 - A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J. FOR THE PETITIONER : ADVS.SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS SMT.V.NAMITHA FOR THE RESPONDENT : BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL, SC. ADV. SMT.PREETHA S. NAIR, SC, SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE. ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs : i. quash the Ext.P14 order-in-original passed by the 3rd respondent. ii. issue a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to allow the return/refund of the amount of  .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r own service tax liability. 3. The petitioner submits that having discharged the entire liability, the petitioner was entitled for refund of the amount remitted by Airport Authority of India to the 3rd respondent. Since no action had been taken in the matter, the petitioner had approached various authorities and ultimately his claim had been rejected as per Ext.P14. In Ext.P14 it is found that the service tax paid by the licensee can be availed as CENVAT credit by the licensee and the airport entry fee is directly collected by the licensee from visitors through issue of airport entry ticket. In the said circumstances, it was found that the question of refund does not arise. The Airport Authority of India having already collected the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eposits a licence fees of ₹ 2,66,797/- per month to AAI but it collects the required fees from the users of the facility and provide all facilities to such customers. S.65 Clause 105(zzm) of Finance Act, 1994 defines 'taxable service' to mean any person, by airports authority or any person authorised by it, in an airport or a civil enclave. It is thus crystal clear that the appellant being a person authorized by AAI to provide service in express terms and conditions, it becomes liable to pay such tax as it was an authorized person to provide taxable service and collect the admission ticket charges on a contract basis. 6. Having regard to the aforesaid factual situation, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates