Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ANIL SHARMA AND 1 Versus UNION OF INDIA AND 3

Conversion of shipping bill from duty drawback scheme to Advance Authorization Scheme - export of white refined sugar / raw sugar - conversion of shipping bill from one scheme to another scheme beyond three months from the date of Let Export Order (LEO) - amendment in the shipping bill to correct the mistake - It is submitted that at the time of execution of goods materials given in declaration will be verified. It is submitted that in the present case it was not verified since shipping bill was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

equently when they requested to amend the bill of entry, the case would fall under Section 149 of the Custom Act, which does not provide any limitation to make application to amend the shipping bill and therefore, the authorities are not justified in rejecting the application on the ground that the same is not within the period of three months, relying upon board Circular No. 36 of 2010. - For enabling an exporter to draw the benefits of any scheme, not only physical verification of the docu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

after holding appropriate inquiry that the raw material which was imported has only been used in the manufacture of final product and that final product has been actually exported. - It cannot be said that the respondents have committed any error and / or illegality in rejecting the application of the petitioner considering the Board Circular No. 36 of 2010 - petition dismissed. - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17991 of 2016 - Dated:- 9-1-2017 - MR. M.R. SHAH AND MR. B.N. KARIA, JJ. FOR THE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

191 dated 17.07.2014 to the effect that the said shipping bill was filed under the Advance Authorization No.0510383348 dated 01.04.2014. 2.0. The facts leading to the present Special Civil Application so pleaded by the petitioner in nutshell are as under: 2.1. That the petitioner no.2 herein M/s. Uniworld Sugars Private Limited, is a sugar refinery located at survey no. 145, village Varsamedi, Tal: Anjar, Dist. Kutch. That the petitioner no.1 is the Director of the aforesaid company. The said re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l Director General of Foreign Trade, Central Licensing Area, New Delhi. That under the said license, the petitioner no.2 was permitted to import 13249.950 MTs of raw sugar having cost insurance and freight (CIF) value of ₹ 35,73,52,500/for manufacture and export of 12619.00 MTs of white refined sugar having a Free On Board (FOB) value of ₹ 41,09,55,375/within a period of 18 months from the date import. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that after receiving the said Advance A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

behalf of the petitioner that as provided in the Foreign Trade Policy, the petitioner was required to export white refined sugar within stipulated period of 18 months. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that same was properly complied with by the petitioner and the aforesaid quantity of 10095.210 MTs of white refined sugar was exported under 14 different shipping bills during the period from 19.06.2014 to 19.09.2014. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that as per the provision in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hkari Sakhar Karkhana Limited. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that subsequently petitioner entered into agreement with the aforesaid Sugar Mill at Maharashtra for supply of 2650.00 MTs of raw sugar under Advance Authorization. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that after sourcing the aforesaid raw sugar domestically, the same was refined and 2516.530 MTs of white refined sugar manufactured out of the said domestically procured quantity of 2642.300 MTs of raw sugar, was also .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ched drawback in the shipping bill. It is the case of the petitioner that as a result of the same, though the exports were under advance authorization, as far as 2516.530 MTs are concerned, the shipping bill showed that the exports were under drawback scheme. 2.2. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that as it was electronically generated shipping bill and the entire system is online, automatically amount of drawback aggregating to ₹ 9,18,388.75 was credited to the account of the pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r dated 30.12.2014 requested the Custom Authority at Kandla to amend the said shipping bill from drawback scheme to Advance Authorization scheme to enable them to take up the matter with the licensing authorities i.e. respondent no.2 herein for realization of their export obligation under the Advance Authorization in question and its redemption. A reminder was sent vide letters dated 27.12.2015, 16.07.2015 and 3.11.2015. That vide communication dated 11.01.2016 the Assistant Commissioner (Export .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted to reconsider its earlier decision by submitting that circular no. 36 of 2010 shall not be applicable in the present case and therefore, it was requested to amend the shipping bill as per Section 149 of the Customs Act. That once again request of the petitioner has been turned down vide communication dated 01.08.2016. Hence, present petitioner has preferred present Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the aforesaid relief. 3.0. Shri D.K. Trivedi, learn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vedi, learned advocate for the petitioner that in the present case it was case of amendment in the shipping bill to correct the mistake and therefore, Section 149 of the Customs Act shall be attracted, which does not provide any time limit for amending the shipping bill. It is submitted that therefore, the impugned communication / decision rejecting the application of the petitioner to amend the shipping bill on the ground that the same is made beyond the period of three months is contrary to th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the account of the petitioner. It is submitted that therefore, considering Section 149 of the Customs Act, respondent ought to have permitted the petitioner to amend the shipping bill, more particularly, when the petitioner had as such export the entire quantity of 2650 MTs of sugar. 4.3. It is further submitted by Shri Trivedi, learned advocate for the petitioner that in the case of amendment of shipping bill where export goods have been exported the same is permissible only on the basis of do .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

actured and exported out of India. It is submitted that therefore, the impugned decision rejecting the application of the petitioner to amend the shipping bill deserves to be quashed and set aside. Making above submission and relying upon the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs vs. Man Industries (I) Ltd reported in 2007(216) ELT 15 (Bom) which has been confirmed by the Hon ble Supreme Court subsequently, it is requested to allow the present petition and gran .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ubmitted before the period of three months, authority is justified in rejecting the said application. 5.2. It is submitted that conversion from one scheme to another scheme will be governed by the concerned Board Circular No. 36 of 2010. In support of his above submission, he has heavily relied upon the decision of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs (SeaportExport), Chennai vs. Suzlon Energy Ltd reported in (2014) 50 Taxmann. Com 401 (Madras) as we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e raw materials used in manufacture of final product. It is submitted that at the time of execution of goods materials given in declaration will be verified. It is submitted that in the present case it was not verified since shipping bill was not filed under DEEC scheme and now the verification is not possible as the materials are not available. Making above submissions and relying upon the above decisions, it is requested to dismiss the present petition. 6.0. Heard the learned advocates for the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

application to amend the shipping bill and therefore, the authorities are not justified in rejecting the application on the ground that the same is not within the period of three months, relying upon board Circular No. 36 of 2010. Identical question came to be considered by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court in the case of Suzlon Energy Ltd (supra). Relying upon considering the decision of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in the case of Terra Films Pvt Ltd (supra), Madras High .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndment could be allowed only if it was based on the documentary evidence in existence at the time the goods were exported. In the said decision, it is further observed that the request made for conversion from one scheme to another scheme is a case of request for conversion and not of amendment inasmuch as by converting from one scheme to another scheme, it was not only addition of word cum duty drawback but change entire status and character of the document. The Delhi High Court has thereafter .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version