Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ORIENT NEWS PRINTS LTD Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- 3 (1) (1)

Reopening of assessment - notice under Section 133 - Held that:- So far as submission on behalf of the Revenue that during the assessment proceedings the learned Assessing Officer did not hold any inquiry and called for the information from the concerned share applicants and/or did not issue any notice to the concerned share applicants under Section 133 of the IT Act is concerned, it is required to be noted that the assessee did furnish all the necessary details with respect to share applicants .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le. - In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, when it has been found that the reasons / grounds on which the assessment is sought to be reopened were already gone into in detail by the learned Assessing Officer while framing the scrutiny assessment and after raising the specific queries with respect to increase in the share capital, with respect to share application money and the income of the assessee from the trading in fabrics, only thereafter when the learned Assessing Off .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt of learned Advocates appearing for respective parties, present petition is taken up for final hearing today. [2.0] By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner - assessee has prayed for an appropriate writ, direction and order to quash and set aside the impugned notice dated 28.03.2016 issued under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as IT Act ) by the respondent - Assessing Officer, by which the learned Assessing Offic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The case was selected for scrutiny and the notice under Section 142(1) of the IT Act was issued by which the learned Assessing Officer called various details with respect to the increase of share capital, share application money, expenditure incurred by the assessee. That the assessee submitted all the necessary details asked by the learned Assessing Officer more particularly with respect to the increase of share capital; with respect to share application money and even the expenditure incurred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Officer has sought to reopen the assessment for the AY 2011-12 alleging inter alia that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. That at the request of the assessee, the learned Assessing Officer has furnished the reasons recorded to reopen the assessment which are as under: 1. During the year, paid up capital of company was increased by ₹ 1,65,00,000 (20,99,00,000 - 19,34,00,000). In addition to this, the assessee also got share application money of ₹ 30,15,00,000 durin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,00,00,000 2 Pawantar Agro Agencies Pvt Ltd Shop No.5, Rizvi Nagar Coop Housing Society, SV Road, Santacruz (W), Mumbai-54 3,00,000 3,00,00,000 3 Param Commodities Pvt Ltd Shop No.5, Rizvi Nagar Coop Housing Society, SV Road, Santacruz (W), Mumbai-54 3,00,000 3,00,00,000 4 Parmarth Agro Marketing Pvt Ltd Shop No.5, Rizvi Nagar Coop Housing Society, SV Road, Santacruz (W), Mumbai-54 3,00,000 3,00,00,000 5 Shri Visnukrupa Commodities Pvt Ltd 202, Sonalika, Behind Natraj Studio, Near Manjrekar Wadi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nfirmation u/s 133 from these parties along with their bank statement corroborating the genuineness of purchase of shares, identity and genuineness of remained unsubstantiated. 11. As such ₹ 16,50,00,000 was required to be treated as income of assessee u/s 68 of the Act. 2. It was further noticed that share application money of ₹ 30,15,00,000 was received from 7 entities located at Kolkata which itself had received money from others as detailed below: Name of entity from which share .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ata Burnpur Power Pvt Ltd 2,00,00,000 Pears Mercantiles Pvt Ltd 262, Panchanantala road, Howrah Burnpur Power Pvt Ltd Drishti Suppliers Pvt Ltd Quest Financial Services Pvt Ltd 5,50,00,000 Wonderland Paper Suppliers Pvt Ltd 27, Netaji Subhash Road, Bally, Howrah Fastner Machinery Pvt Ltd 3,00,00,000 Cyrus Infocomm Pvt Ltd No.17, Ground Floor, Prabhat Center, Belapur, Navi Mumbai CottTex Fabrics Pvt Ltd 50,00,000 Anurodh Infrastructure Pvt Ltd 319,21, Jessore Road, Kolkata Pears Mercantiles Pvt L .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has no details at all. Pranjeevan Distributor Pvt Ltd from which Burnpur Power Pvt Ltd has stated to receive money as advance and Fastner Machinery Pvt Ltd from which Wonderland Paper Suppliers Pvt Ltd has stated to receive money as advance have no details. Dristi Suppliers Pvt Ltd which has advanced money to Quest Financial Services Pvt Ltd, Burnpur Power Pvt Ltd and Pears Mercantiles Pvt Ltd in AY Financial Services Pvt Ltd, Burnpur Power Pvt Ltd and Pears Mercantiles Pvt Ltd in AY 2011-12 (FY .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or copies of invoices are available on record. It was not clear that when the purchase was of paper only, how there was sale of shirting fabrics only. Incidentally, there was no opening / closing balance of any stock. As such, ₹ 1,43,22,938 was required to be treated as income of assessee. [3.2] That the assessee submitted his detail objections against the reasons recorded for reopening vide his communication dated 06.05.2016. It was the specific case on behalf of the assessee that the gr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e learned Assessing Officer framed the assessment. Therefore, it was submitted that the reopening can be said to be on a mere change of opinion by the subsequent Assessing Officer which is not permissible. With respect to the ground No.3 it was specifically submitted that during the year under consideration, the business of the assessee was trading in fabrics and it was a typographical error in the P&L Accounts and by mistake it was stated to be paper purchase . Therefore, it was requested t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gs is bad in law. [4.1] It is submitted that the impugned reassessment proceedings are merely on change of opinion by the subsequent Assessing Officer. It is submitted that from the reasons recorded it can be said that the learned Assessing Officer has sought to reopen the assessment for AY 2011-12 on three grounds / reasons i.e. (1) increase in share capital; (2) share application money and (3) with respect to the expenditure incurred / income from sales being sales of shirting fabrics of ͅ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essing Officer and only thereafter the learned Assessing Officer framed scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the IT Act. It is submitted that therefore, the impugned reopening is on a mere change of opinion of the subsequent Assessing Officer, which is not permissible. It is submitted that it is not the case on behalf of the learned Assessing Officer that on the basis of any new material collected subsequently, he has formed an opinion that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alf of the Revenue has tried to oppose the present petition by submitting that in the assessment order the learned Assessing Officer has not discussed anything in detail with respect to the increase in the share capital and also with respect to the share application money. It is submitted that even no notices were sent to the respective share applicants as required under Section 133 of the IT Act, to satisfy himself with respect to the genuineness of the share applicants / share application mone .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the material on record that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment, the learned Assessing Officer is justified in reopening the assessment in AY 2011-12. Making above submissions and relying upon the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Praful Chunilal Patel vs M.J. Makwana, Assistant CIT reported in (1999)236 ITR 832, it is requested to dismiss the present petition. [6.0] Heard learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties at length. At the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssing Officer, specific queries were raised by the learned Assessing Officer with respect to increase in the share capital; with respect to share application money as well as the income of the assessee from trading in fabrics. It is the case on behalf of the assessee that only thereafter the learned Assessing Officer framed the scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the IT Act. From the material on record it is found that during the scrutiny assessment, the learned Assessing Officer raised .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lso furnished the details of the sales made by the assessee, to the respective parties. Vide communication dated 06.09.2013 the assessee answered the specific queries with respect to the increase in the share capital as well as the share application money. With respect to the increase in the share capital, the assessee produced the confirmation letter from the party confirming the said investments; share application form; bank statement for the relevant period; acknowledgement for filling their .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt under Section 143(3) of the IT Act. Therefore, subsequent reopening on the aforesaid grounds can certainly be said to be on a mere change of opinion by the subsequent Assessing Officer. As held by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Kelvinator India Ltd. (Supra) and the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Gujarat Power Corporation Ltd. (Supra), on mere change of opinion by a subsequent Officer, the reopening of the concluded scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the IT Act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

missible. Even otherwise on facts the said decision shall not be applicable to the facts of the case on hand. In the case before the Division Bench of this Court, it was found that the Assessing Officer subsequently found a glaring mistake for which the assessment was sought to be reopened. The Division Bench observed that though all the necessary materials were furnished by the assessee, when the Assessing Officer has subsequently found a mistake, the reopening is permissible within a period of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: PROCEDURE FOR SHIFTED OF FINISHED GOODS FROM AP KARNATAKA TO UP

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version