TMI Blog2017 (2) TMI 207X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to the Original Authority with a direction to him to examine the submissions in form of Annexure - D & Annexure - G annexed to reply dated 27/03/2008 to the said Show Cause Notice and also take into consideration the submission before him that the credit of ₹ 8,63,764/- was already reversed and decide the issue afresh after giving opportunity of hearing to the appellant - Appeal allowed by w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ith a Show Cause Notice No. 41/Additional Commissioner/Alld./2007 dated 19/09/2007. It was alleged in the Show Cause Notice for the period from September, 2006 to March, 2007 that appellant availed inadmissible Cenvat credit amounting to ₹ 23,31,409/- on inputs in respect of items falling under Chapter 72 73 claiming that the same were neither input nor capital goods . Therefore, ther ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d place of installation and specific functions/use and in relation to final products in respect of items which was disputed by the department through the said Show Cause Notice and contended that in view of the definition of capital goods, the credit availed by them in respect of said capital goods included in Annexure - G was admissible. Further, the appellant also submitted the details in the fo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Order-in-Appeal No. 98/CE/ALLD/2010 dated 30/03/2010. The ld. Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Original-in-Original. Aggrieved by the said order appellant is before this Tribunal. 3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the appellants. He has submitted that in reply to the said Show Cause Notice through Annexure - D Annexure - G the details required for adjudication were submitted to the Original ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
