Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise & S.T., Kanpur Versus M/s Avon Awning

2017 (2) TMI 211 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

Levy of tax - the respondent is not involved in designing, visualizing, conceptualizing of the advertisements, and that the respondent was just engaged in printing the advertising materials provided to him by his client and was also performing additi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

same grounds and ultimately the matter reached before this Tribunal and this Tribunal in the case of M/s Avon Awning Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & S. Tax, Ghaziabad [2016 (10) TMI 683 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD], has held that for the activities s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2017 - Dated:- 3-1-2017 - Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Supdt. (A.R.) for the Department (s) Shri Dharmendra Srivastava, CA for the Respondent (s) ORDER The present appeal is filed by Revenue against order-in-Appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The allegation in the show-cause-notice was that the respondents were providing taxable service under Advertising Agency Service. The said show-cause-notice was adjudicated through Order-in-Original dated 18.02.2010, wherein the Original Authority c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in-Appeal dated 26.03.2010. The appellate Authority has held that it is an admitted fact on the department's part that the respondent is not involved in designing, visualizing, conceptualizing of the advertisements, and that the respondent was ju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iable to Service Tax. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the said Order-in-Original dated 18.02.2010. Aggrieved by the said Order-in-Appeal, Revenue preferred appeal before this Tribunal. 3. Heard the Ld. DR for Revenue, who has supported the O .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version