2011 (5) TMI 1053

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... with Shri D.S. Chadha, Advocate, for the Respondent. JUDGMENT These appeals are filed against the orders dated 12th May, 2010, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ('CESTAT') [2014 (314) E.L.T. 689 (Tri. - Del.)] whereby appeals of these appellants have been dismissed. 2. Mr. Mullick, learned counsel for the appellant at the outset has drawn our attention to th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... earned counsel for the respondent could not dispute the aforesaid averment, namely, that the application was in fact preferred by the appellants on 11th May, 2010. The said application bears the stamp of the Tribunal which indicates that it was filed on 11th May, 2010. Even otherwise, the aforesaid averment is supported by an affidavit filed along with this application. 4. We have also heard .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X