Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Sukalp Agencies Versus Commissioner of Customs, C.E. & S.T., Lucknow

2017 (2) TMI 253 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

Attachment of property - raw materials, work-in-progress, and finished goods - appellant contention that due to attachment, it has become practically impossible for appellant to run their factory - Held that: - the re-adjudication is still pending with respect to the part of demand, set aside by this Tribunal vide Final Order dated 19th March, 2013 amounting to ₹ 12,85,084/-. Also appellant has made substantial payment of the confirmed demand during the last 8 months - the order of the att .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

part - matter on remand. - E/MISC/70007/2017 APPEAL No.E/2497/2005-EX[DB] - Misc ORDER NO-70014/2017 - Dated:- 9-1-2017 - Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) and Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) Shri Vinod Kumar Rastogi, Advocate for Appellant Shri Rajeev Ranjan, Joint Commissioner (AR), for Respondent ORDER This Miscellaneous Application has been filed by the appellant- M/s. Sukalp Agencies arising out of Final Order No. 55868-55878/2013 dated 19th March, 2013. The prayer in miscel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

paid the duty amount by debiting the amount to the Cenvat register totaling ₹ 19,58,725/- (Rs.1 Lakh on 22.04.16,Rs. 2 Lakhs on 04.08.16 and ₹ 16,58,725/- on 04th May, 2016).It is further pointed out that appellant unit is a running unit and they are in the business of assembling and manufacturing of Diesel Generator sets of Kirloskar Brand. It is further pointed out that vide order of attachment dated 16th December, 2016 the Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise Division-II, Lucknow .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ss, and finished goods, it has become practically impossible for appellant to run their factory. It is in no one s interest to stop the operation of the factory at this stage when the appellant have paid substantial amounts in the recent past and have pending dispute with the revenue regarding part of demand which was set aside by this Tribunal. Accordingly, he prays for modification of the attachment order to the effect that the industry can be run by releasing the raw materials work-in-progres .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version