Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Hydus Technologies India Pvt Ltd. Versus CCE, C & ST, Hyderabad-II

2017 (2) TMI 538 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

Cenvat Credit - 100% EOU - Refund claim - rejection on the ground of nexus - telecommunication services - Insurance services - Held that: - Merely because the SIM card or invoice is in the name of the employee it cannot be concluded that the mobile phone is for personal use of the employee when the address shows that of the company - refund allowed. - Insurance services - Held that: - Though in the definition of input services it is mentioned that life insurance, health insurance etc., are e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Reddy, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent. [Order per: Sulekha Beevi, C.S.] 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal aggrieved by the rejection of refund claim filed for the period October 2012 to March 2013. 2. The appellants are a 100% EOU engaged in the activity of providing integrated solutions to develop the integrated IT solutions to the clients abroad. They are registered with the service tax department as service provider under Information Technology Software Services. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vices which are tabulated as under: Nature of Service Submissions Credit Rejected Legal Services (CA) - PH before Commissioner Appeals 1. Specifically included in definition of Input service u/r. 2 (1) of CCR, 2004 2. Relied on KNOAH SOLUTIONS PVT LTD vs CC, CE & ST 2016-TIOL-1592-CESTAT-HYD 1 ,854 Legal services (CA) - FEMA consultancy 2,472/- Interior, Electrical and ancialliary works 1. Services relating to 'renovation / modernization / repair s are specifically covered under inclusiv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt (employer) to its eligible employees and this insurance policy does not cover risk of life or health and purely restricted to payment of gratuity. Insurance taken u/s. 4A of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. 5,251/- Employee Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme Services received are as part of statutory compliance (The Employees' Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976) and not for primarily for personal use/consumption of employee. Relied on RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD vs CCE & ST 2016-TlOL-2392-C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ELLON INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS INDIA PVT LTD vs CCE 2016-TIOL-2828-CESTAT-MUM 92,518/- Total 1,80,519/- 4. He submitted that the authorities below have rejected the refund of service tax paid in respect of the above services for the reason that the services do not have nexus with the output services provided by the appellant. The Ld. Counsel relied upon the following decisions: (i) M/s Knoah Solutions Private Ltd., Vs CC, CE & ST, Hyderabad-IV [2016-TlOL-1592-CESTAT-HYD] (ii) CST, Mumbai Vs .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

xcluded as per the definition in 2(l) of input service and therefore the authorities below have rightly denied the credit. It is submitted by him that these services are for personal use and consumption of the employees and therefore are not eligible for credit. 6. I have heard the rival submissions made before me. The appellant has claimed refund of service tax paid on legal services received from M/s Hiregange and Associates and M/s SBC and Company. It is submitted that though they have claime .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

linked insurance and employee health insurance. He submitted that these services are excluded in the definition of input service and therefore the appellant is not eligible for refund. Though the Ld. AR has put forward strong objections there is no document before me to establish that the said services are availed for personal use or personal consumption of the employee. The Ld. Counsel for appellant explained that the group gratuity scheme is a gratuity policy for the employees of the company .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version